Excel Parking Letter of Claim

Le_Kirk

Have you received the claimant's witness statement with a similar document appended (or have you received it at all)?  If so, the WS from @jrhys applies to you and you can leave it in, if not then take it out.  If you do at some point receive a similar redacted contract, then put it back in.  The example we show are just that - examples for content and style and have to be adjusted to suit your particular circumstances.

Jenni_D

Ah right - you're asking about whether those sections apply to you. Same feedback as above.

Bonez257

Le_Kirk said:

Have you received the claimant's witness statement with a similar document appended (or have you received it at all)?  If so, the WS from @jrhys applies to you and you can leave it in, if not then take it out.  If you do at some point receive a similar redacted contract, then put it back in.  The example we show are just that - examples for content and style and have to be adjusted to suit your particular circumstances.

The last thing I received from the Claimant was a letter telling me that their Legal Representatives are no longer acting on their behalf and that they are willing to accept a reduced settlement charge of £185. That was back in September. This was after I got a letter "Notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track" from the CCBC notifying me that it is now a defended claim and someone has crossed out the next part of the sentence that says "a copy of which is enclosed". 

Then in October I received another letter from the court that states "notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing)" and they attach a 2nd part addressed to Elms Legal (even though the Claimant sent me a letter stating they've (Elms Legal) ceased to act on their behalf)? But the part addressed to Elms Legal says the exact same thing as the part addressed to me (that the claimant needs to pay the court fee by a certain time and what time and date the hearing will take place.

Bonez257

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/dsz50fuv7gwr2dgqu14oc/BONEZ257-WS-2.docx?dl=0&rlkey=g7jrsq5pk9a9onzx0qq0jt8mm

This is the updated version. Thank you all for your feedback. I've merged paragraph 5 and 7 into one paragraph so it should be easier to read

Le_Kirk

Bonez257 said:

Le_Kirk said:

Have you received the claimant's witness statement with a similar document appended (or have you received it at all)?  If so, the WS from @jrhys applies to you and you can leave it in, if not then take it out.  If you do at some point receive a similar redacted contract, then put it back in.  The example we show are just that - examples for content and style and have to be adjusted to suit your particular circumstances.

The last thing I received from the Claimant was a letter telling me that their Legal Representatives are no longer acting on their behalf and that they are willing to accept a reduced settlement charge of £185. That was back in September. This was after I got a letter "Notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track" from the CCBC notifying me that it is now a defended claim and someone has crossed out the next part of the sentence that says "a copy of which is enclosed". 

Then in October I received another letter from the court that states "notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing)" and they attach a 2nd part addressed to Elms Legal (even though the Claimant sent me a letter stating they've (Elms Legal) ceased to act on their behalf)? But the part addressed to Elms Legal says the exact same thing as the part addressed to me (that the claimant needs to pay the court fee by a certain time and what time and date the hearing will take place.

Have you a date for the hearing or just a notice of allocation to small claims track?  If there is a date, there should be also a date (or it might say "14 days before the date of hearing") for submitting the WS and the claimant (or their representative) has the same deadline as you.

Bonez257

Le_Kirk said:

Bonez257 said:

Le_Kirk said:

Have you received the claimant's witness statement with a similar document appended (or have you received it at all)?  If so, the WS from @jrhys applies to you and you can leave it in, if not then take it out.  If you do at some point receive a similar redacted contract, then put it back in.  The example we show are just that - examples for content and style and have to be adjusted to suit your particular circumstances.

The last thing I received from the Claimant was a letter telling me that their Legal Representatives are no longer acting on their behalf and that they are willing to accept a reduced settlement charge of £185. That was back in September. This was after I got a letter "Notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track" from the CCBC notifying me that it is now a defended claim and someone has crossed out the next part of the sentence that says "a copy of which is enclosed". 

Then in October I received another letter from the court that states "notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing)" and they attach a 2nd part addressed to Elms Legal (even though the Claimant sent me a letter stating they've (Elms Legal) ceased to act on their behalf)? But the part addressed to Elms Legal says the exact same thing as the part addressed to me (that the claimant needs to pay the court fee by a certain time and what time and date the hearing will take place.

Have you a date for the hearing or just a notice of allocation to small claims track?  If there is a date, there should be also a date (or it might say "14 days before the date of hearing") for submitting the WS and the claimant (or their representative) has the same deadline as you.

I have a date and time for the hearing and there is also a date for submitting the WS which is 22/11/2021. So if receive the Redacted Landowner Contract from the Claimant would I be able to add it into my WS after the deadline?

Redx

You can add a supplementary WS with supplementary evidence , to both Court and claimant

Coupon-mad

Crack on with your WS.  Recent good examples of how it can look are by @jrhys and @Nosy.

Bonez257

Redx said:

You can add a supplementary WS with supplementary evidence , to both Court and claimant

Brilliant. So if they send this document then i'll add in the bit about the redacted landowner contract

Bonez257

Coupon-mad said:

Crack on with your WS.  Recent good examples of how it can look are by @jrhys and @Nosy.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/dsz50fuv7gwr2dgqu14oc/BONEZ257-WS-2.docx?dl=0&rlkey=g7jrsq5pk9a9onzx0qq0jt8mm

This is my updated WS after feedback