We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Claim due to lightening damage
Comments
-
Lightning strikes are an "act of god" not negligence on their part, they did not cause the damage.gavin2812 said:
Could you let me know why they would not be liable?MattMattMattUK said:
They are correct, they are not liable, you need to claim on your contents insurance. You can go to the ombudsman or court, you will lose in both.0 -
Why didn't you have adequate lightning suppression at your end?gavin2812 said:
I'm not suggesting the provider is responsible for the lightening. I am suggesting that they did not have adequate lighting suppression in place allowing it to travel down their line and damage my equipmentk3lvc said:
If you manage to find an address for God to serve the papers to please let me know - I've a backlog of things I have an issue with
7 -
it it your responsibility to evaluate and implement any lightening supression requirements at your premises.
while we are on the subject, the same applies for your power source for the devices as mains power fluctuations can occur.1 -
Hence why those geeks like me, with expensive gaming PCs and TVs etc. have surge protectors and UPS backups in place.pbartlett said:it it your responsibility to evaluate and implement any lightening supression requirements at your premises.
while we are on the subject, the same applies for your power source for the devices as mains power fluctuations can occur.3 -
Or failing that, just unplug stuff when lightning is forecast.MattMattMattUK said:
Hence why those geeks like me, with expensive gaming PCs and TVs etc. have surge protectors and UPS backups in place.pbartlett said:it it your responsibility to evaluate and implement any lightening supression requirements at your premises.
while we are on the subject, the same applies for your power source for the devices as mains power fluctuations can occur.3 -
I thought this was going to be a post about an adverse reaction to a chemical peel treatment, or similar.
Anyway, as per the other replies, I can't see how the telecoms company is liable, so an insurance claim or self-funded replacement of equipment is your choice to make.2 -
Surges are not always weather related, outages and brownouts can happen as well.user1977 said:
Or failing that, just unplug stuff when lightning is forecast.MattMattMattUK said:
Hence why those geeks like me, with expensive gaming PCs and TVs etc. have surge protectors and UPS backups in place.pbartlett said:it it your responsibility to evaluate and implement any lightening supression requirements at your premises.
while we are on the subject, the same applies for your power source for the devices as mains power fluctuations can occur.0 -
I had a few of those but nothing to do with lightningbrownouts can happen as well.
- are they insurable 0 -
That might depend on what, other than your pride, was damaged...k3lvc said:
I had a few of those but nothing to do with lightningbrownouts can happen as well.
- are they insurable
0 -
When did they tell you that they did have this equipment installed?gavin2812 said:
I'm not suggesting the provider is responsible for the lightening, that would be silly.p3ncilsharpener said:I fail to see why your phone line provider is responsible for lightning strikes, unless they're also God.
I am suggesting that they did not have adequate lighting suppression in place allowing it to travel down their line and damage my equipment
Because everything that was connected (physically) to their phone line was destroyed.gettingtheresometime said:I'm not sure I can answer this any more less sarcastically than to ask you why you think the telephone provider is responsible?user1977 said:Why do you think the telecomms provider is liable?
Because everything that was connected (physically) to their phone line was destroyed.
Plus once it goes past the master socket, its your telephone line not theirs.
Throw away money issuing court proceedings if you wish, there is always a chance that they will settle because commercially its cheaper to pay up than defend but you are more likely just throwing good money after bad. The cost of going to court depends on the amount being claimed.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
