We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Double commission
Options
Comments
-
@nnewtoarea I would agree with the posters above who have suggested that you try not to pay the whole fee. Yes you can afford to pay it but that doesn't mean you need to.
And you don't even need to go to court or anything to dispute the fee. At no cost to yourself, you can use the agency's complaint process followed by the TPO. Worst case scenario at the end of all this you are asked to make the payment, no worse off than if you did now.
Pick the new EA's brains, the guidance+case cited above and consider building an argument. Good luck!I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
2 -
davilown said:Surely the act of giving a buyer a viewing doesn’t amount to them selling the property? I thought they had to be involved with the negotiations etc?
’ where the Court of Appeal ruled for an estate agent to claim commission it had to be involved in the sale, not just the introduction.’
Foxtons v Bicknell & Another, 20081 -
Irishpearce26 said:davilown said:Surely the act of giving a buyer a viewing doesn’t amount to them selling the property? I thought they had to be involved with the negotiations etc?
’ where the Court of Appeal ruled for an estate agent to claim commission it had to be involved in the sale, not just the introduction.’
Foxtons v Bicknell & Another, 2008
as others have said, definitely worth challenging - most EA contracts have very large holes in them that aren’t legally enforceable.
Be very interesting to hear what the outcome is.30th June 2021 completely debt free…. Downsized, reduced working hours and living the dream.2 -
Thanks all. Will call them tomorrow and see what happens.
Fingers crossed1 -
nnewtoarea said:Thanks all. Will call them tomorrow and see what happens.
Fingers crossed30th June 2021 completely debt free…. Downsized, reduced working hours and living the dream.0 -
OP, do remember that just because xyz in written in the EA contract, does not mean that it is enforceable. Keep that in mind when you assess your options.2
-
Surely EA 2 is the one you should be arguing with? You gave them notice that the buyer had been introduced by EA 1, so they should accept that or reduce their fee? What was the point of giving them the list? What did they say about it?
1 -
NameUnavailable said:Surely EA 2 is the one you should be arguing with? You gave them notice that the buyer had been introduced by EA 1, so they should accept that or reduce their fee? What was the point of giving them the list? What did they say about it?
I completely agree - Agent 2 is the villain.
What Agent 2 says here is nonsense:nnewtoarea said:I had forwarded the list from Agency 1 to agency 2. When I discussed this with Agency 2 before the sale, they said as they got me a higher sales price ( around 30 k difference) the commission will not be due.
From what you say, Agent 2 knew the buyer was introduced by Agent 1. So Agent 2 should have sent the buyer back to Agent 1.
And from what you say, it seems that Agent 2 compounded their wrongdoing by lying to you and saying no commission was due to Agent 1. (Agent 2 must have known that was a lie.)
Here's the clause in The Property Ombudsman's Code of Practice that Agent 2 has breached:
5t
- establish if an interested party has previously viewed through another agent;
- if an interested party has previously viewed through another agent and makes an offer through you, you must disclose this information and refer the sale back to that agent as they will be deemed to have introduced the buyer (please refer to supplementary TPO ‘Dual Fee’ guidance).
Link: https://www.tpos.co.uk/images/Codes_2019_a5/TPOE27-8_Code_of_Practice_for_Residential_Estate_Agents_A5_-_Effective_1_June_2019.pdfSo you need to make a formal complaint to Agent 2.
Assuming that Agent 2 is a member of the Property Ombudsman Scheme (most are), you can follow up with a complaint to the ombudsman.
2 -
This makes perfect sense. Thanks a lot for this specific snippet.0
-
It may make ‘perfect sense’ but they only introduced the buyer, they didn’t negotiate the sale30th June 2021 completely debt free…. Downsized, reduced working hours and living the dream.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards