We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buying a house with insurance claim 40 yrs ago
Options
Comments
-
TBorg said:
He claims it was voluntarily done, lot of houses on the street did the same at that time.3 -
AdrianC said:TBorg said:
He claims it was voluntarily done, lot of houses on the street did the same at that time.
Exactly my thoughts. And why would insurance cover "voluntary" underpinning? Unless there was some regulatory change in 1980s.
He doesn't have documents from that time.
Is there anything that can be done to convince us to go ahead? Or is it time to walk away?
0 -
The garage is separate from the house? If so, it’s usually cheaper to knock it down and rebuild it properly than underpin it.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
-
Who currently insures the property? They should be willing to continue insuring it.
We have had subsidence. It didn't need underpinning, but our buyers have had no issue finding insurance. And if they did our current insurers (who we made the claim under) are happy to continue the policy.
Our claim was 2 years ago, so 40 should hopefully not be an issue!2 -
Justonemorecupoftea said:Who currently insures the property? They should be willing to continue insuring it.
We have had subsidence. It didn't need underpinning, but our buyers have had no issue finding insurance. And if they did our current insurers (who we made the claim under) are happy to continue the policy.
Our claim was 2 years ago, so 40 should hopefully not be an issue!0 -
We have just received surveyor's report. He thinks the movement is not ongoing but says that a survey by structural engineer is needed to fully confirm that. Any suggestions for me please?0
-
You will not need specialist insurers, there may be a slightly higher excess, think ours is about £1000. For the first 5 years after we had a subsidence claim we stayed with the original insurer just for peace of mind but since then have shopped around. Our premium for a 4 bedroomed large detached house on 1/4 acre plot surrounded by mature trees is £320 per annum.
I would have a word with a structural engineer before having a full survey done. As it is over 40 years old there is no way he can tell you 100% whether there will be further movement. A good indication is to look at the outside of the house, if there are no zig zag cracks on the brickwork externally it is unlikely that there has been any signifiant movement.
Your vendors should also be able to produce a certificate showing that the problem was dealt with and signed off 40 years ago..1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards