We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Philips CPAP Field Safety Notice - Told to stop using machine - right to refund?
Options
Comments
-
I didn't have any problems with previous machines
This is your health we are talking about, so why not just go out and buy another one whilst dealing with getting a partial refund on this one?!?!?!?Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)1 -
alcoholfree said:But at the moment they are sticking to the "wait up to a year without treatment" line.
That's why I said their reputation in CPAP is dead. It will not recover from this. Let's hope not too many people out of the 4 million plus users of their machines out there don't die from it.
Perhaps they are dealing with the cases where there is a risk to life 1st.
Do you really think any manufacture could source 4 million units in less than a year. Even if they refunded everyone that is +10,000 a day for a year.Life in the slow lane0 -
born_again said:alcoholfree said:But at the moment they are sticking to the "wait up to a year without treatment" line.
That's why I said their reputation in CPAP is dead. It will not recover from this. Let's hope not too many people out of the 4 million plus users of their machines out there don't die from it.
Perhaps they are dealing with the cases where there is a risk to life 1st.
Do you really think any manufacture could source 4 million units in less than a year. Even if they refunded everyone that is +10,000 a day for a year.0 -
pinkshoes said:
I didn't have any problems with previous machines
This is your health we are talking about, so why not just go out and buy another one whilst dealing with getting a partial refund on this one?!?!?!?
I will probably have to buy one, but they are close to 1000 euros and supplies are very low and prices rising because of this issue. It's not like popping to the chemist for some paracetamol.
0 -
born_again said:alcoholfree said:But at the moment they are sticking to the "wait up to a year without treatment" line.
That's why I said their reputation in CPAP is dead. It will not recover from this. Let's hope not too many people out of the 4 million plus users of their machines out there don't die from it.
We're hitting our fifth wave of Covid over here (436 case per 100,000 today nationally and close to 1000 per 100,000 in some areas of my province).
I don't think hospitals (and it is the hospital that deals with this, not a GP), need every single Philips CPAP user making appointments in the pneumology department at this time to ask a question if they know the answer to it. Philips are saying this to cover their !!!!!! more than anything.0 -
This is the NHS take on it.
They are in a better position to assess the dangers and consider the risk of not using is greater than continuing to use it.
4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards