We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is it worth reporting someone who brake checked you?
Comments
-
Quite easily if the OP was correctly allowing 200 feet stopping distance (about 15 car lengths) before pulling in in front of the HGV after the overtake.molerat said:Again not excusing the other driver's behaviour but I can't see how they got in front of the HGV and undertook you if you if you were carrying out the overtake correctly.
1 -
I have been taught that it's safe to move back to first lane once you can see the front of the vehicle you have just overtaken in the rear view mirror and always check over your shoulder to double check.zagfles said:
Quite easily if the OP was correctly allowing 200 feet stopping distance (about 15 car lengths) before pulling in in front of the HGV after the overtake.molerat said:Again not excusing the other driver's behaviour but I can't see how they got in front of the HGV and undertook you if you if you were carrying out the overtake correctly.0 -
where do you get that from ?zagfles said:
Quite easily if the OP was correctly allowing 200 feet stopping distance (about 15 car lengths) before pulling in in front of the HGV after the overtake.molerat said:Again not excusing the other driver's behaviour but I can't see how they got in front of the HGV and undertook you if you if you were carrying out the overtake correctly.
as above - I was always told to pull back in once i could see the vehicle in my mirror
Most people couldn't judge 200 feet looking forwards , let alone in their rear view mirror and I assume you mean this distance would change based on the speed of the vehicle that you are overtaking
.
That would require another variable to be considered whilst conducting an overtake.
Frankly (imo)- speed and distance are the factors that drivers seem to struggle with the most.
The "mirror" method is perfectly adequate and safe
1 -
JamoLew said:
where do you get that from ?zagfles said:
Quite easily if the OP was correctly allowing 200 feet stopping distance (about 15 car lengths) before pulling in in front of the HGV after the overtake.molerat said:Again not excusing the other driver's behaviour but I can't see how they got in front of the HGV and undertook you if you if you were carrying out the overtake correctly.
as above - I was always told to pull back in once i could see the vehicle in my mirror
Most people couldn't judge 200 feet looking forwards , let alone in their rear view mirror and I assume you mean this distance would change based on the speed of the vehicle that you are overtaking
.
That would require another variable to be considered whilst conducting an overtake.
Frankly (imo)- speed and distance are the factors that drivers seem to struggle with the most.
The "mirror" method is perfectly adequate and safeStopping distance at about 55mph, usual HGV speed https://theorytest.org.uk/stopping-distances/But even if you just wait till you can see the car in the rear view mirror, that still gives an idiot driver behind you the opportunity to undertake you after overtaking the HGV.
0 -
No - I understand how the other driver manage to perform their manoeuvre
What I was questioning was your use of factoring in the stopping distance of the other vehicle in determining when the overtake manoeuvre is safely concluded -- not something I have ever heard or read before
Whilst it probably makes a good deal of sense - you used the word "correctly" indicating it was something that was commonly known/understood/documented and that any other method was incorrect0 -
There's certainly no need to leave the other vehicle's complete stopping distance before pulling back in - not least because you're travelling faster, so your own stopping distance is longer...
Vehicles don't just come to a sudden dead stop.
Sure, don't chop right in the very second your back bumper's clear of their front... but don't wait until you're a mile down the road with a hundred metres clear... That's just going to make the vehicles behind you think that you're not planning on ever moving back left. Especially if you've bimbled slowly past, seemingly oblivious to their presence...3 -
Except when you submit the footage via the Police dashcam reporting sites, they will ask you to remove any online versionsneilmcl said:
Absolutely no reason why it would.wazza2004 said:
Would like to post footage but will seek advice from police first. I read somewhere that if I put the footage on social media it might affect the case.caprikid1 said:"Had the cruise control set at 70mph. "
I suspect you oblivous to the driver behind wanting to progress and were relatively slow to complete the overtake and return to the nearside lane. Given that he managed to overtake you.
No excuse for brake checking, post up the footage here so we can see.
Thames Valley certainly do/did0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards