PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

1960s Semi Dormer Bungalow - Home Buyers or Structural Survey

Options
Hi everyone, 

I've done a lot of reading about whether a home buyers or structural survey would be most appropriate - but seem to be going round in circles due to all of the different opinion. My lender quotes a £250 cost difference between the two. i'm edging towards paying the extra and going for the structural survey -  but not sure whether this could be a waste? Any advice appreciated. 

Key information about the property:
- 1960 build
- Semi-detached
- Dormer bungalow (believe its a conversion)
- Rear extension added

I plan to partially knock down a wall in the rear extension - screenshots of current and planned floorplan  (outlining the planned wall removed attached). 

Any help is greatly appreciated. 


Comments

  • youth_leader
    youth_leader Posts: 2,922 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I paid for a full structural on my 1930's bungalow, admittedly older than your proposed property,  and was glad I did - the 'wall ties' are the original soft metal and bitumen, and have rotted in various places. 
    £216 saved 24 October 2014
  • I'd always go structural. I have just sold my house (1930s semi) and the buyers had a homebuyers survey. I was there while the surveyors did it and it was honestly a joke, they were there for 15mins tops and did nothing apart from measure the rooms and have a quick look round. They didn't even look in the loft.

    It'd be a nightmare being a guest staying overnight with that layout, you'd have to give them a map to find the bathroom!
  • tdawber
    tdawber Posts: 116 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think everybody’s experience is different, our buyer had a Home buyers done and the surveyor was there 3 hours!!
  • Cakeguts
    Cakeguts Posts: 7,627 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    We always have structural engineer's reports.
  • kdotdotdotdot
    kdotdotdotdot Posts: 329 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I bought a 60's chalet bungalow (EA description, not mine!) and got a full, structural report.  In the end, it wasn't needed as there wasn't anything wrong that I couldn't already see with my own eyes, but it's a relief to have the certainty.  If you're very experienced with houses, then maybe you don't need one, but otherwise go for it.  After all, that £250 might save you thousands later on.  Or not.  You never know until you do it.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.