We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
We're aware that some users are currently experiencing errors on the Forum. Our tech team is working to resolve the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Vanguard Life Strategy 60% - Vanguard SIPP or II?
Comments
-
Sounds like we're at a similar knowledge stage - I've just started taking an interest in this recently. I have my Dad to thank for the fact I've got a pension at all - he virtually frogmarched me to the Bradford and Bingley when I started work to make me set one up! Very glad he did now (at the time I was a lot less impressed!).SomeMadeUpName said:Regardless, I think your own sums show you are a little better off consolidating in II.
My understanding though is still quite limited, as I only engaged in this retirement planning about 3 months ago. So I'd wait until you are sure yourself or others have agreed.
You are well ahead of us (SIPP wise) at present, meaning our SIPP is better in Vanguard as the lower fund sizes make the % charging structure better (plus like you we currently have no interest in wide ranges of possible investments, too scary atm).
II will be cheaper until I reach approx £300,000, but then Vanguard will be cheaper (if my maths is right), as they cap their management charge (the 0.15% bit) at £375: so, £375 + (0.22% x 300k) = £1035 with Vanguard versus £240 flat fee + (0.27% x 300k) = 1050 with II. Although looking at what eskbanker says, maybe Vanguard will change the extra 0.05% somewhere. So confusing.
0 -
Just compare the £375 with the £240 platform costs.
VLS60 costs the same wherever you buy it from.2 -
Exactly, @eskbanker is saying the VLS60 will cost the same wherever, it is just presented more openly on II that there is aprox an extra 0.05% to budget for.lucyandthomas said:
Sounds like we're at a similar knowledge stage - I've just started taking an interest in this recently. I have my Dad to thank for the fact I've got a pension at all - he virtually frogmarched me to the Bradford and Bingley when I started work to make me set one up! Very glad he did now (at the time I was a lot less impressed!).SomeMadeUpName said:Regardless, I think your own sums show you are a little better off consolidating in II.
My understanding though is still quite limited, as I only engaged in this retirement planning about 3 months ago. So I'd wait until you are sure yourself or others have agreed.
You are well ahead of us (SIPP wise) at present, meaning our SIPP is better in Vanguard as the lower fund sizes make the % charging structure better (plus like you we currently have no interest in wide ranges of possible investments, too scary atm).
II will be cheaper until I reach approx £300,000, but then Vanguard will be cheaper (if my maths is right), as they cap their management charge (the 0.15% bit) at £375: so, £375 + (0.22% x 300k) = £1035 with Vanguard versus £240 flat fee + (0.27% x 300k) = 1050 with II. Although looking at what eskbanker says, maybe Vanguard will change the extra 0.05% somewhere. So confusing.
So Vanguard versus II (setting aside the greater choice on II) comes down to:
12x£20 versus 0.15% (capped at £375), so it's all down to fund size. Just eliminate the VLS 0.22/0.27% from your calcs.
II though does cover ISA etc in that charge, and there is that greater choice if you ever wanted to go more speculative on a small portion.
Oooo, listen to me sounding all knowledgable!2 -
You're nearly right but the 0.05% doesn't need to be 'budgeted for', as you don't visibly pay it as such - it's an internal cost within the fund, so any time you see fund performance figures they're given after accounting for such costs (including the OCF).SomeMadeUpName said:Exactly, @eskbanker is saying the VLS60 will cost the same wherever, it is just presented more openly on II that there is aprox an extra 0.05% to budget for.
[...]
Oooo, listen to me sounding all knowledgable!0 -
@SomeMadeUpName
Ha ha - yes, very impressed!
Vanguard also include ISA/JISA etc in their charge. It sounds like it's basically a question of weighing up the effort (probably not very much if I'm honest) to open up an II account and transfer my small Vanguard SIPP (and probably my son's JISA) to save £135 quid a year.0 -
That said, I've been happy with Vanguard. I like the platform and the app, and they've responded quickly when I've asked a couple of questions. No experience with II. Maybe a case of 'better the devil you know'. Now I realise the cost difference between II and Vanguard SIPPs is less than I first thought, I might just stick with Vanguard. Something to mull over.
Thanks everyone for your help.0 -
Yeah, I know, but what better way to phrase it?eskbanker said:
You're nearly right but the 0.05% doesn't need to be 'budgeted for', as you don't visibly pay it as such - it's an internal cost within the fund, so any time you see fund performance figures they're given after accounting for such costs (including the OCF).SomeMadeUpName said:Exactly, @eskbanker is saying the VLS60 will cost the same wherever, it is just presented more openly on II that there is aprox an extra 0.05% to budget for.
[...]
Oooo, listen to me sounding all knowledgable!
Maybe 'accounted for' but that's not great either, maybe 'taken into consideration'. Yep, that will do.0 -
Just as a point of reference if you do decide to use ii then using a cashback site such as quidco would give you £196 cashback.1
-
I use ii and my wife uses Vanguard. We recently both switched our age old Halifax SS ISAs over to our respective platforms.With ii the transfer was smooth and happened in a couple of weeks. With my wife's Vanguard she is still waiting, some 12 weeks later and despite regular messaging to them, calling them and receiving promises to call her back we are no further on. Halifax say they are waiting for Vanguard to contact them. I like Vanguard but they haven't covered themselves with glory on this.My experience of ii has been that they have been really helpful, accessible and easy to deal with.1
-
Thanks for your message - interesting to hear from someone with recent experience of both. Starting to think I should bite the bullet and go with II.Lostweekend said:I use ii and my wife uses Vanguard. We recently both switched our age old Halifax SS ISAs over to our respective platforms.With ii the transfer was smooth and happened in a couple of weeks. With my wife's Vanguard she is still waiting, some 12 weeks later and despite regular messaging to them, calling them and receiving promises to call her back we are no further on. Halifax say they are waiting for Vanguard to contact them. I like Vanguard but they haven't covered themselves with glory on this.My experience of ii has been that they have been really helpful, accessible and easy to deal with.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
