We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Car hit me from behind. He said it was my fault
Comments
-
It's difficult to envisage a situation where driving in to the rear of another vehicle can be the fault of the driver in front.
0 -
Have you not read about the crash for cash scams? Apparently removing bulbs from brake lights is a common part of this along with random emergency stops.Mickey666 said:It's difficult to envisage a situation where driving in to the rear of another vehicle can be the fault of the driver in front.
"We act as though comfort and luxury are the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about” – Albert Einstein0 -
Those scams only work because the person behind is always liable irrespective of contributory action by the person Infront.Clive_Woody said:
Have you not read about the crash for cash scams? Apparently removing bulbs from brake lights is a common part of this along with random emergency stops.Mickey666 said:It's difficult to envisage a situation where driving in to the rear of another vehicle can be the fault of the driver in front.0 -
I will never understand why people do this.ritesh said:There is a natural tendency to look right as you approach a roundabout to see if it is clear.
Wait for your path to be clear then check to see if there's any oncoming traffic. Rushing and looking for gaps before your "turn" is just asking for trouble.1 -
They exist. In one well reported case a driver responded to being tailgated by slamming his brakes on for no good reason. The Court of Appeal decided that they were both to blame for the resulting collision, and split liability 60/40.Mickey666 said:It's difficult to envisage a situation where driving in to the rear of another vehicle can be the fault of the driver in front.
https://www.casecheck.co.uk/ali-v-d-brass-ca-23-11-11.html
It's unusual though and requires some pretty bad driving by the person in front. In this case, braking because the lights have changed ahead is nothing like braking because you want to teach the guy behind you a lesson, and is extremely unlikely to add up to any blame on the OP's part.1 -
Whilst it would appear to be the case here, this mindset that it's 'always' the person behind's fault is exactly how those fake accident people make their money.
0 -
The OP had to slam the anchors on as the lights changed which suggests they weren't prepared to stop nor was it safe to do so. They may have not been fully at fault but it doesn't take away from the fact that it was pretty poor driving.AdrianC said:
Eh?neilmcl said:Even though you contributed to the accident by your own poor observation and late braking
Green - prepare to stop.
Amber - stop, unless it's not safe to do so.
The OP did exactly what they should have done - stopped when the lights went from green to amber.
It's not their fault the driver behind wasn't looking where they were going.0 -
I agree that there are scenarios where mindlessly slamming on the brakes with no regard to what's behind you is mental.neilmcl said:
The OP had to slam the anchors on as the lights changed which suggests they weren't prepared to stop nor was it safe to do so. They may have not been fully at fault but it doesn't take away from the fact that it was pretty poor driving.AdrianC said:
Eh?neilmcl said:Even though you contributed to the accident by your own poor observation and late braking
Green - prepare to stop.
Amber - stop, unless it's not safe to do so.
The OP did exactly what they should have done - stopped when the lights went from green to amber.
It's not their fault the driver behind wasn't looking where they were going.0 -
But the person behind should have left enough space for them to be able to stop in time if the driver did something like slam their brakes on.BOWFER said:
I agree that there are scenarios where mindlessly slamming on the brakes with no regard to what's behind you is mental.neilmcl said:
The OP had to slam the anchors on as the lights changed which suggests they weren't prepared to stop nor was it safe to do so. They may have not been fully at fault but it doesn't take away from the fact that it was pretty poor driving.AdrianC said:
Eh?neilmcl said:Even though you contributed to the accident by your own poor observation and late braking
Green - prepare to stop.
Amber - stop, unless it's not safe to do so.
The OP did exactly what they should have done - stopped when the lights went from green to amber.
It's not their fault the driver behind wasn't looking where they were going.
Or, at least, that's how I drive - assuming every other person on the road is an idiot.
I think watching 20mins of dashcam videos should be part of the driving test. It'll teach you that a) anything can happen, b) when something does happen it happens very suddenly and c) it's amazing how badly some people drive.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

