We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Who owns which fence?

illbeurhuckleberry
Posts: 168 Forumite

Hi all.
please can I have your opinion. Moved into a property recently. Previous owner informs me I am only responsible for the back fence . I was under the opinion I was responsible for the right fence also.
I've had a look at the plans snd it does look like I am not responsible for
the right or left fence snd the T marks are on my neighbours boundary. Please see pic attached.it’s plot 125.
Am I correct?
please can I have your opinion. Moved into a property recently. Previous owner informs me I am only responsible for the back fence . I was under the opinion I was responsible for the right fence also.
I've had a look at the plans snd it does look like I am not responsible for

Am I correct?
0
Comments
-
The T marks should be defined in the deeds and/or plan. If they are not defined, they do not technically mean anything. The usual convention is that they imply responsibility for a boundary, but that is not a rule.
In addition, responsibility for a boundary does not actually mean ownership of a fence. Usually it does suggest that - if you are responsible for a boundary then you are supposed to mark it, and the usual way of doing that is a fence. But again, that is not a rule.
What really matters is who bought and put the fence in. Often, however, that's difficult to establish, and so things like T marks can provide some supporting evidence to reach a decision in the absence of any other evidence.
Your plan is unfortunately blurry and you have not defined what you mean by 'right' or 'left' (from the street? On the plan?).0 -
whoever owns the fence is whoever paid for it, either by having it installed or by buying the house whose previous owner had it installed.
who is responsible for maintaining the boundary, and how, will be in the deeds and/or diagrams supplemental to those deeds. If a fence isn’t specified, a bit of string between two sticks might be enough to meet the requirement.
These are two different things. Usually they overlap, but not always. I own both side fences to my garden cos I’ve got dogs who would love to go roaming if they had a chance, so both neighbours were happy for me to replace the existing fences when they got a bit shabby. I’ve no idea who has the legal responsibility to maintain the boundary, that would only ever come up if there was a problem. But I paid for the fences, so I own them.
and I can’t make out any detail on your plan above - which rectangle is the house and which is the garden/fenced area?
stig1 -
Let's step back a bit - why are you asking?3
-
I’m asking out of interest because it’s most unusual to only be responsible for the back fence. Snd no- there’s no issues with the neighbours etc etc etc.0
-
illbeurhuckleberry said:I’m asking out of interest because it’s most unusual to only be responsible for the back fence. Snd no- there’s no issues with the neighbours etc etc etc.1
-
illbeurhuckleberry said:I’m asking out of interest because it’s most unusual to only be responsible for the back fence. Snd no- there’s no issues with the neighbours etc etc etc.#2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £3660
-
Thanks everyone. So it’s who ever bought the fence owns it but maintaining the boundary is a different manner. So assuming the fence is on there side of the boundary. 🤦♀️🤯
0 -
Usually people are happy to have a single fence on the actual boundary - much less hassle and confusion. But yes, there’s nothing to stop people erecting a fence entirely on their own property, maybe because the fence on the boundary has fallen into disrepair but the owner doesn’t want to replace it, or one side wants a six foot fence to keep dogs in but the other is happy with the 3ft picket fence in place. This is where the responsibility to maintain the actual boundary should kick in, to prevent a feature on one side or the other from being treated as the boundary incorrectly.
To be honest though, if I was looking to buy a house and saw two parallel fences separating the properties I’d assume some sort of neighbour dispute and would take a lot of convincing that this wasn’t the case.
stig
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards