Surprise CCJ Dilemma

Coupon-mad

Oh no, that is a shame.

Sadly, you were always going to find it hard when the only WS and photos the Judge had to go on, were from the other side, with no WS from you.

Bad luck - but not terrible and you cost them a lot more!  Can't say I agree that the NTK was POFA compliant but you can't argue if the Judge considered it and decided it was.  Also, you don't even know if the driver did pay and display and maybe just made a VRM typo, so it is harsh for the Judge to conclude that the driver failed to pay, unless there was actual evidence in their bundle.

Sounds like the Judge considered the issues and when that happens, and the signs are considered clear, the best you can then do is get the false DRA fee removed - and you did!

And we sincerely hope that you are au fait with the need to respond to the final Government Public Consultation, soon?

Hopefully - amongst all the political disruption - it will be open later this year and probably into January.

We all need to ram the nail in the coffin of the false £70 'DRA fee' add-on, that actually funds the court claim and toxic CCJ culture, as well as the DRA gaslighting of people.

Just checking you are among those ready to respond to the questions as you have personal experience of how this crap feels?

Please come back here when it opens, and you can make sure you don't miss the Consultation:

If you are not a regular reader, to be alerted you'll need to bookmark the thread by MSE_JC at the top of the forum and enable (on your profile) email alerts for bookmarked threads.

No need for a link to that thread, please go read it now. Then join us when the Public Consultation opens. Sorry if you knew all this already - I had no time to check back through the thread.