We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Stamp duty query about owning rental property
Comments
-
SDLT_Geek said:The HMRC guidance in their manual explains it, especially SDLTM09800. In your case the "replacement exception" does not apply because you are retaining ownership of your old home.
But in my case, I am not replacing my main residence because I am not selling my current main residence. In order to do what you are doing, I would need to not live in my current main residence for some time before buying a new one (3 years).
I think that makes sense, thanks!
On a related note: I only intend to rent my current main residence due to necessity, and in fact aim to sell it as soon as possible (within 3 years). Ideally I would not pay any SDLT, but I think I am forced to pay it upfront then apply for a refund later when it is sold... right?0 -
Ricky116 said:SDLT_Geek said:The HMRC guidance in their manual explains it, especially SDLTM09800. In your case the "replacement exception" does not apply because you are retaining ownership of your old home.
Correct
The fact that you have an additional rental property doesn't come in to it.
If someone has other properties, they can still escape the 3% SDLT surcharge if they are selling their current home and buying a new one.
But in my case, I am not replacing my main residence because I am not selling my current main residence.
Correct, so the extra 3% will be due.
In order to do what you are doing, I would need to not live in my current main residence for some time before buying a new one (3 years).
No, that it not how it works. This would make your position worse! It would mean that if you sold your old home after buying your new home, you would not be entitled to a refund of the extra 3% SDLT.
I think that makes sense, thanks!
On a related note: I only intend to rent my current main residence due to necessity, and in fact aim to sell it as soon as possible (within 3 years). Ideally I would not pay any SDLT, but I think I am forced to pay it upfront then apply for a refund later when it is sold... right?4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards