We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House buying risks
Comments
-
MobileSaver said:Keswick1uk said:People did lose houses in the mid 90s. When we moved in 1994 most homes we viewed were repossessions. It was very sad times.While there were of course repossessions, I think the worst it ever got was in 1991 when a whopping 0.26% of all homes were repossessed... most years of that era it was much less than that.Keswick1uk said:Thing is many people didn't actually see this as they just lived where they did throughout the whole crisis.0
-
MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:Are you seriously suggesting this "biggest hit in 300 years" was caused by "high house prices/rents" and not caused by one of the worst global pandemics in recent history?!?!Are there any other foreign countries' jobs figures we should be looking at instead of our own?If the U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months then should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?My view is we should concentrate on our own job totals.You avoided answering my question: If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?The "300 year v 70 year problem" was your poor attempt to deflect from your embarrassing allegation: Are you still claiming that "high house prices/rents are trashing the economy" and have caused the "biggest hit in 300 years"?As for the "300 year v 70 year problem", not surprisingly shutting down pretty much the entire country caused a massive and immediate downturn in the economy last year. We are already approaching half-way through 2021, many restrictions are still in place and it is unlikely that normality will return until 2022, if even then; consequently the fact that growth in 2021 will not entirely cancel out the drop in 2020 is hardly a shocker is it?0
-
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:while obviously devastating for the people involved it was of little concern to more than 99% of home-owners.Well yes but there were far fewer homes too, I don't think the percentage of owner-occupiers has changed much.As usual I think you are over-exaggerating the problem, for a number of reasons:
- From memory around half of all owner-occupiers own outright with no mortgage so repossession is of course a non-issue
- Since the last crash lenders have had to take proactive action to help struggling borrowers
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to check borrowers could comfortably afford repayments
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to follow strict rules before beginning any repossession
- For years 100% mortgages have been non-existent for all intents and purposes and in fact the average deposit is 15% so lenders and borrowers have much more leeway for agreeing an alternative to repossession. (In fact I think the average equity is something like 40% in the UK.)
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?
Every generation blames the one before...
Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years0 -
MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:while obviously devastating for the people involved it was of little concern to more than 99% of home-owners.Well yes but there were far fewer homes too, I don't think the percentage of owner-occupiers has changed much.As usual I think you are over-exaggerating the problem, for a number of reasons:
- From memory around half of all owner-occupiers own outright with no mortgage so repossession is of course a non-issue
- Since the last crash lenders have had to take proactive action to help struggling borrowers
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to check borrowers could comfortably afford repayments
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to follow strict rules before beginning any repossession
- For years 100% mortgages have been non-existent for all intents and purposes and in fact the average deposit is 15% so lenders and borrowers have much more leeway for agreeing an alternative to repossession. (In fact I think the average equity is something like 40% in the UK.)
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?0 -
MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:while obviously devastating for the people involved it was of little concern to more than 99% of home-owners.Well yes but there were far fewer homes too, I don't think the percentage of owner-occupiers has changed much.As usual I think you are over-exaggerating the problem, for a number of reasons:
- From memory around half of all owner-occupiers own outright with no mortgage so repossession is of course a non-issue
- Since the last crash lenders have had to take proactive action to help struggling borrowers
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to check borrowers could comfortably afford repayments
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to follow strict rules before beginning any repossession
- For years 100% mortgages have been non-existent for all intents and purposes and in fact the average deposit is 15% so lenders and borrowers have much more leeway for agreeing an alternative to repossession. (In fact I think the average equity is something like 40% in the UK.)
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?
Mass repossessions are a thing of the past. No govt will allow it. Just like they haven’t allowed mass unemployment and mass evictions in the last twelve months.
I guarantee that he’ll ignore all your reasons and respond with some generic non-point instead.
Oh he did.4 -
SpiderLegs said:MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:while obviously devastating for the people involved it was of little concern to more than 99% of home-owners.Well yes but there were far fewer homes too, I don't think the percentage of owner-occupiers has changed much.As usual I think you are over-exaggerating the problem, for a number of reasons:
- From memory around half of all owner-occupiers own outright with no mortgage so repossession is of course a non-issue
- Since the last crash lenders have had to take proactive action to help struggling borrowers
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to check borrowers could comfortably afford repayments
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to follow strict rules before beginning any repossession
- For years 100% mortgages have been non-existent for all intents and purposes and in fact the average deposit is 15% so lenders and borrowers have much more leeway for agreeing an alternative to repossession. (In fact I think the average equity is something like 40% in the UK.)
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?
Mass repossessions are a thing of the past. No govt will allow it. Just like they haven’t allowed mass unemployment and mass evictions in the last twelve months.
I guarantee that he’ll ignore all your reasons and respond with some generic non-point instead.
Oh he did.0 -
SpiderLegs said:MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:while obviously devastating for the people involved it was of little concern to more than 99% of home-owners.Well yes but there were far fewer homes too, I don't think the percentage of owner-occupiers has changed much.As usual I think you are over-exaggerating the problem, for a number of reasons:
- From memory around half of all owner-occupiers own outright with no mortgage so repossession is of course a non-issue
- Since the last crash lenders have had to take proactive action to help struggling borrowers
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to check borrowers could comfortably afford repayments
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to follow strict rules before beginning any repossession
- For years 100% mortgages have been non-existent for all intents and purposes and in fact the average deposit is 15% so lenders and borrowers have much more leeway for agreeing an alternative to repossession. (In fact I think the average equity is something like 40% in the UK.)
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?
Mass repossessions are a thing of the past. No govt will allow it. Just like they haven’t allowed mass unemployment and mass evictions in the last twelve months.
I guarantee that he’ll ignore all your reasons and respond with some generic non-point instead.
Oh he did.
I like some aspects of this house, and other aspects I`m not so sure, but the 175k price drop so far is good.
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/77494609#/
People just need to be careful that they keep an eye on realistic value if they are buying in this market IMO.0 -
Crashy_Time said:SpiderLegs said:MobileSaver said:Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:while obviously devastating for the people involved it was of little concern to more than 99% of home-owners.Well yes but there were far fewer homes too, I don't think the percentage of owner-occupiers has changed much.As usual I think you are over-exaggerating the problem, for a number of reasons:
- From memory around half of all owner-occupiers own outright with no mortgage so repossession is of course a non-issue
- Since the last crash lenders have had to take proactive action to help struggling borrowers
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to check borrowers could comfortably afford repayments
- New laws were passed years ago forcing lenders to follow strict rules before beginning any repossession
- For years 100% mortgages have been non-existent for all intents and purposes and in fact the average deposit is 15% so lenders and borrowers have much more leeway for agreeing an alternative to repossession. (In fact I think the average equity is something like 40% in the UK.)
Crashy_Time said:MobileSaver said:If U.S. jobs figures exceed expectations in the coming months should we all be celebrating boom times ahead or are their jobs figures only relevant when worse than expected?
Mass repossessions are a thing of the past. No govt will allow it. Just like they haven’t allowed mass unemployment and mass evictions in the last twelve months.
I guarantee that he’ll ignore all your reasons and respond with some generic non-point instead.
Oh he did.0 -
Sure, but are you joking about the US data being a "non-point"? You are, right?0
-
Crashy_Time said:I like some aspects of this house, and other aspects I`m not so sure, but the 175k price drop so far is good.
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/77494609#/
People just need to be careful that they keep an eye on realistic value if they are buying in this market IMO.
Last sold £283,500 https://www.rightmove.co.uk/house-prices/detailMatching.html?prop=63150550&sale=55763924&country=england
Now after "** WOW ** FULL REFURBISHMENT **" reduced from £725k to £550k and what's more they've taken a lot of character out of the house. Emperor's new clothes anyone?
Makes you wonder about the cashflow implications dropping £175k and still not selling after 15 months.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards