Beavis insight -- Motorway services insight and ... Claims lost in court ... and N.Ireland

beamerguy

Parking company claims LOST in court
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6103933/abuse-of-process-thread-part-2
=================================================
DRP (DEBT RECOVERY PLUS)
Group Thread to ensure DRP are ignored ?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6275792/drp-debt-recovery-plus-group-thread-to-ensure-drp-are-ignored#latest
=================================================

The infamous Letter Beore Claim

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6284467/the-infamous-letter-beore-claim#latest
=================================================

For parking tickets in Northern Ireland....... SCROLL DOWN
=================================================
It is late 2017 and I found it on Youtube.
It is the famous case ... Nicholas Bowen QC v Parking Eye
MOTORWAY SERVICES ........ "Save lives take a break"
Interesting for those who are currently having problems with MOTO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSLjI7IeTOE&ab_channel=Zeb

D_P_Dance

This is what happens when you ticket a QC.

Umkomaas

I'd not seen that before - thanks. We don't see many court-successful motorists come away with a £1,500 cheque in their back pocket. I expect had it been Nicholas Bowen QC plumber, it wouldn't have been any more than £100. 

Snakes_Belly

I bet his billing rate per hour is higher than Elms.   

beamerguy

This post is for newbies to help them understand 

Following on with Parking Eye and the Barry Beavis case.
The following video is the decision made by the Supreme court. It involves two cases, one of which is Parking Eye v Barry Beavis.

Regarding Beavis, you will hear the Supreme court judge clearly state ..... "The main reason for the £85 charge was to meet the costs of enforcing the parking rules"
When PPC's, debt collectors and legals refer to the Beavis case as if it was a magic wand for them, and then add extra charges in the disguise of fabrications, one must ask (and a judge) ....
WHAT PART OF THESE WORDS DON'T THEY UNDERSTAND ..
"The main reason for the £85 charge was to meet the costs of enforcing the parking rules" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFIH1Vwu1DM&ab_channel=UKSupremeCourt

Snakes_Belly

Thanks for posting Beamer. That is really interesting. The Supreme Court are wrong though in thinking that there is parity between the LA and the PPC's.

Lord S is a character  

beamerguy

Snakes_Belly said:

Thanks for posting Beamer. That is really interesting. The Supreme Court are wrong though in thinking that there is parity between the LA and the PPC's.

Lord S is a character  

And not forgetting that this very high court, the highest, created a major problem to the lowest, the county courts, who actually have better things to do.

Question to everyone ..... Will the new CoP IGNORE the words of the Supreme Court if it includes costs for debt collectors as EXTRAS ???

When the Supreme court said "The £85 meets the costs of enforcing the parking rules"   Who would be deemed correct ?
Giving a county court judge another problem to fathom out

beamerguy

This video is for the benefit of those new to this scam.

The Video is 2 years old and it is the start of the new Code of Practice for parking operators.
This was introduced to the House of Commons by Sir Greg Knight MP who you will see smiling at the back of the House 
Since then, it passed through "The other place", the House of Lords and is now law.
We are waiting for this law to be enacted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkjzNxP8VrY&ab_channel=AndrewGwynne

At the moment the two ATA's, BPA and the IPC together with parking companies have reacted badly and are, right up to the last minute, trying to change the Code.
The government would be very unwise to listen to further representations designed only for the benefit of the private parking industry.

This is a rare time where all sides of the house agreed 
=====================================
Scottish MP, Pete Wishart voiced his thoughts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwfnFAfkvDo&ab_channel=PeteWishart

beamerguy

NORTHERN IRELAND

Watch this video below ....
The Consumer Council covers N. Ireland who say ..

"We provide free, independent support and advice for all consumers and businesses in Northern Ireland."

They seem to be similar to the English CAB but with a lot more clout as this chap had his Smart parking ticket cancelled
https://www.consumercouncil.org.uk/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CiL0u4CYg0&ab_channel=TheConsumerCouncil

patient_dream

Gladstones - Disciplinary Hearing

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/register/organisation/?sraNumber=559050#headingRegulatoryRecord

THIS IS PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE

The above thread was started by zhonguonuren ..... thanks