We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Is it dismissal offence?

1234568

Comments

  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,674 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.

    There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.

    Generation bubble wrap...
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • Anyanka1
    Anyanka1 Posts: 174 Forumite
    100 Posts
    Anyanka1 said:
    This whole thing sounds nuts to me:  Since when is "refugee" a derogatory term?  
    How do you greet somebody in a professional capacity when you first meet them?  
    Assuming they had the courtesy to introduce themselves, by their name.  Assuming they did not, I would introduce myself and expect them to furnish their name.  In the absence of either, I would probably ask how they are.  In the circumstances quoted, I might <shock, horror> make some reference to the fact they had been seconded from another department with no expectation they would be snowflakey enough to take offence.  Whatever happened to backbone?  Yeah, I'm a fossil.
  • atothec
    atothec Posts: 28 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    JamoLew said:
    pinkshoes said:
    There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.

    There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.

    Generation bubble wrap...
    100% agree 

    I cant fathom that anyone in that circumstance could deem the use of the word refugee as offensive 

    I am still convinced there is more to this the we (and probably the OP) are aware of

    OP - all I can advise (as others already have), in the meeting be calm, be truthful, listen to what is said.

    Accept that they took "offence" to your word - they did for whatever reason

    Explain your understanding of the word and that you thought you had used it in an appropriate manner - imo you did, but acknowledge that is was maybe misunderstood and/or misinterpreted and that no malice was intended

    If needs be (and this would grate me as well) - apologise for any any offence you may have inadvertently caused - it defuses the situation rather that inflames it






    Already have apologised in the meeting, and yet I'm being taken for disciplinary hearing. 
  • baza52
    baza52 Posts: 3,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    atothec said:
    JamoLew said:
    pinkshoes said:
    There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.

    There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.

    Generation bubble wrap...
    100% agree 

    I cant fathom that anyone in that circumstance could deem the use of the word refugee as offensive 

    I am still convinced there is more to this the we (and probably the OP) are aware of

    OP - all I can advise (as others already have), in the meeting be calm, be truthful, listen to what is said.

    Accept that they took "offence" to your word - they did for whatever reason

    Explain your understanding of the word and that you thought you had used it in an appropriate manner - imo you did, but acknowledge that is was maybe misunderstood and/or misinterpreted and that no malice was intended

    If needs be (and this would grate me as well) - apologise for any any offence you may have inadvertently caused - it defuses the situation rather that inflames it






    Already have apologised in the meeting, and yet I'm being taken for disciplinary hearing. 
    you never replied to say whether YOU would of been offended if they had called you an immigrant?
    Would you expect HR to take the same action you are facing?
  • JamoLew
    JamoLew Posts: 1,800 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 May 2021 at 7:21PM
    But he didn’t call them immigrants - that word can have much more racist undertones (but even then, not in itself an offensive word)

    He referred to them as refugees which in effect - they were
  • baza52
    baza52 Posts: 3,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    JamoLew said:
    But he didn’t call them immigrants - that word can have much more racist undertones (but even then, not in itself an offensive word)

    He referred to them as refugees which in effect - they were
    you are correct and i used the wrong word. My mistake.
    Same question still applies tho.
  • baza52
    baza52 Posts: 3,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    JamoLew said:


    He referred to them as refugees which in effect - they were
    the definition of the words suggest they were not refugees tho does it.


    refugee

    noun
    noun: refugee; plural noun: refugees
    1. a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.
      "tens of thousands of refugees fled their homes"


      I dont see how going to a temporary location to work would make them refugees
  • JamoLew
    JamoLew Posts: 1,800 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Micky666 In Page 3 expanded on that definition and perfectly explained how it could be applied in this particular case.

    I am genuinely and truly staggered that:

    a) the 2 employees in question were/are genuinely offended by that word/comment in the context and scenario it was made

    b) it has been allowed to go as far as it has
  • baza52
    baza52 Posts: 3,029 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    JamoLew said:
    Micky666 In Page 3 expanded on that definition and perfectly explained how it could be applied in this particular case.

    I am genuinely and truly staggered that:

    a) the 2 employees in question were/are genuinely offended by that word/comment in the context and scenario it was made

    b) it has been allowed to go as far as it has
    it does not matter what definitions of the word it only matters how the 2 employees took it meaning and if anything was implied by the OP when saying it.

    For example i could say to a colleague "go home" it could be taken as go back to where you live or it could taken as go back to where you came from. Its not what you say its how you say it that makes a difference.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.