We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Is it dismissal offence?
Comments
-
There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.
There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.
Generation bubble wrap...
Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)4 -
100% agreepinkshoes said:There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.
There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.
Generation bubble wrap...
I cant fathom that anyone in that circumstance could deem the use of the word refugee as offensive
I am still convinced there is more to this the we (and probably the OP) are aware of
OP - all I can advise (as others already have), in the meeting be calm, be truthful, listen to what is said.
Accept that they took "offence" to your word - they did for whatever reason
Explain your understanding of the word and that you thought you had used it in an appropriate manner - imo you did, but acknowledge that is was maybe misunderstood and/or misinterpreted and that no malice was intended
If needs be (and this would grate me as well) - apologise for any any offence you may have inadvertently caused - it defuses the situation rather that inflames it
5 -
Assuming they had the courtesy to introduce themselves, by their name. Assuming they did not, I would introduce myself and expect them to furnish their name. In the absence of either, I would probably ask how they are. In the circumstances quoted, I might <shock, horror> make some reference to the fact they had been seconded from another department with no expectation they would be snowflakey enough to take offence. Whatever happened to backbone? Yeah, I'm a fossil.Thrugelmir said:
3 -
Already have apologised in the meeting, and yet I'm being taken for disciplinary hearing.JamoLew said:
100% agreepinkshoes said:There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.
There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.
Generation bubble wrap...
I cant fathom that anyone in that circumstance could deem the use of the word refugee as offensive
I am still convinced there is more to this the we (and probably the OP) are aware of
OP - all I can advise (as others already have), in the meeting be calm, be truthful, listen to what is said.
Accept that they took "offence" to your word - they did for whatever reason
Explain your understanding of the word and that you thought you had used it in an appropriate manner - imo you did, but acknowledge that is was maybe misunderstood and/or misinterpreted and that no malice was intended
If needs be (and this would grate me as well) - apologise for any any offence you may have inadvertently caused - it defuses the situation rather that inflames it0 -
you never replied to say whether YOU would of been offended if they had called you an immigrant?atothec said:
Already have apologised in the meeting, and yet I'm being taken for disciplinary hearing.JamoLew said:
100% agreepinkshoes said:There are always people who are going to get offended by what isn't at all offensive.
There was clearly no malice meant in what the OP said and the whole "getting offended" by it is ridiculous.
Generation bubble wrap...
I cant fathom that anyone in that circumstance could deem the use of the word refugee as offensive
I am still convinced there is more to this the we (and probably the OP) are aware of
OP - all I can advise (as others already have), in the meeting be calm, be truthful, listen to what is said.
Accept that they took "offence" to your word - they did for whatever reason
Explain your understanding of the word and that you thought you had used it in an appropriate manner - imo you did, but acknowledge that is was maybe misunderstood and/or misinterpreted and that no malice was intended
If needs be (and this would grate me as well) - apologise for any any offence you may have inadvertently caused - it defuses the situation rather that inflames it
Would you expect HR to take the same action you are facing?0 -
But he didn’t call them immigrants - that word can have much more racist undertones (but even then, not in itself an offensive word)
He referred to them as refugees which in effect - they were1 -
you are correct and i used the wrong word. My mistake.JamoLew said:But he didn’t call them immigrants - that word can have much more racist undertones (but even then, not in itself an offensive word)
He referred to them as refugees which in effect - they were
Same question still applies tho.0 -
the definition of the words suggest they were not refugees tho does it.JamoLew said:
He referred to them as refugees which in effect - they wererefugeenounnoun: refugee; plural noun: refugees- a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster."tens of thousands of refugees fled their homes"
I dont see how going to a temporary location to work would make them refugees
1 -
Micky666 In Page 3 expanded on that definition and perfectly explained how it could be applied in this particular case.
I am genuinely and truly staggered that:
a) the 2 employees in question were/are genuinely offended by that word/comment in the context and scenario it was made
b) it has been allowed to go as far as it has3 -
it does not matter what definitions of the word it only matters how the 2 employees took it meaning and if anything was implied by the OP when saying it.JamoLew said:Micky666 In Page 3 expanded on that definition and perfectly explained how it could be applied in this particular case.
I am genuinely and truly staggered that:
a) the 2 employees in question were/are genuinely offended by that word/comment in the context and scenario it was made
b) it has been allowed to go as far as it has
For example i could say to a colleague "go home" it could be taken as go back to where you live or it could taken as go back to where you came from. Its not what you say its how you say it that makes a difference.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
