We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Restrictive Covenants with New Build

stumpygibbon
Posts: 6 Forumite

I'm in the process of buying a David Wilson new build with my partner. We've just received the contract and there's a few more restrictive covenants than they originally mentioned when we reserved the plot. There's only two that I'm not super happy about, but we've been told we can't have them taken out. One is that we can't ever change the front of the property/drive, and the other is we have to keep the plants they put on our property, again forever. I'd understand if these were for the years they're still building, but it seems odd that its forever.
To be honest, this is not enough to put us off, I just wanted opinions on if this is unusual or normal for developments, and if anyone will really care if in 10 years time we change a lavender bush outside.
To be honest, this is not enough to put us off, I just wanted opinions on if this is unusual or normal for developments, and if anyone will really care if in 10 years time we change a lavender bush outside.
0
Comments
-
Where do they get immortal plants from?
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll11 -
I get the bit about not changing the front, developers and local authorities seem to be fixated on preserving the street scene of new developments. Ours has this in the deeds, it doesn’t bother me especially but I do wonder how long it will be after the developer clears off for someone to do something to their house.As for the plants, as the previous poster has said, plants don’t last forever anyway and surely as long as you don’t plant huge triffids it shouldn’t matter. I’d definitely be pushing back on that if we had that in ours.0
-
theoretica said:Where do they get immortal plants from?
1 -
tinytiddles said:I get the bit about not changing the front, developers and local authorities seem to be fixated on preserving the street scene of new developments. Ours has this in the deeds, it doesn’t bother me especially but I do wonder how long it will be after the developer clears off for someone to do something to their house.As for the plants, as the previous poster has said, plants don’t last forever anyway and surely as long as you don’t plant huge triffids it shouldn’t matter. I’d definitely be pushing back on that if we had that in ours.
I'll ask the developers again about the plants, glad other people think that bit's stupid too!
1 -
Once the development is complete then the builders aren't going to care. Though your neighbours might complain if you build a fence or wall,0
-
Are they really going to have plant inspectors doing spot checks - I'd doubt it - sounds crazy IMHO. What can't you change at the front - on my last estate, people had to change doors, garage doors etc after a few years, particularly as the ones fitted were the cheapest ugliest things the builders could find I think0
-
covenants more than likely held by the builders so they will be the only ones who can enforce and there not likely to once they have left site, Our estate had similar covenants plus no satellite dishs on front of the house etc. but no one had really stuck to them0
-
Bizarrely the contract implies that we've got to replace them with the same if they die.(My username is not related to my real name)0
-
"To be honest, this is not enough to put us off"
But it might put off future buyers, worth a moments thought, depending on your "forever home" plans.Peter
Debt free - finally finished paying off £20k + Interest.0 -
Keeping plants the same is a sensible thing and probably put in by the council. You get two grades of stupidity
Too many people rip out plants making the place like the surface of the moon and air quality suffers.
Then you have people planting leylandii because it’s cheap resulting in neighbours disputes and subsidence.
I can see why town planners take control of this. We have a cherry tree Avenue with only cherry trees in a front gardens, imagine if a few people decided to pour over concrete or plant a leylandii, concrete avenue or leylandii avenue might be the new name.
on the bright side, you know exactly what your home will look like in the future.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards