We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Nurse who pays for contract parking "fined" for using the wrong space

First, apologies if this post is covered elsewhere in the forum - I've tried searching for a similar case relating to contract parking with no success.
My wife works at our local hospital and pays something like £26 a month, taken straight out of her wages, for the privilege of parking there. Parking is always a lottery as the contractor has issued many more permits than there are spaces (and it will shortly get much worse). There are two types of staff parking, standard and "premium".
On the day in question, my wife arrived 30 minutes before her shift to find no standard staff spaces available, despite spending 15-20 minutes looking round the various car parks on site, so had to park in a premium bay to avoid being late for work. As you will have guessed, she came out at 10pm to find the little yellow square stuck to her windscreen.
So, what should/shouldn't we do as she has no intention of paying the robbing £$$(*&$(%?
Would the fact that the company charges for the right to park but doesn't guarantee a space will be available, fall under unfair contract terms?
«1

Comments

  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 44,210 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Complain to her Trust Facilities team (or whoever organises the parking arrangements) and ask them to sort this out. 

    Which parking firm?

    Which hospital (we will possibly have seen cases there before)?
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    #Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • Thanks all for the information so far. I did look in the Newbie threads but couldn't see anything about contract parking arrangements - probably just my poor searching. I'll have a read of the GOV.UK doc.
    The hospital is the Royal Stoke Hospital, which is part of the University Hospitals of North Midlands (UHNM) trust. I believe it's APCOA who are the contractor.
    As an aside, she recently got some debt demands for old infractions from ZZyouknowwho, along with dozens of her colleagues, but the hospital had those cancelled as a clerical error (translated to: we don't like the bad publicity).
    For further info. - the situation is about to get worse. The trust has just sold the site of a former hospital about 1/2 a mile away that until now was used for overflow parking and had several hundred spaces.
  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • Umkomaas said:
    Your wife shouldn't concern herself about APCOA, they are totally benign. I suspect they have issued a Notice to Keeper (NtK) that doesn't comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4), so as long as the driver doesn't 'out' themselves, there's nowt APCOA can do. 

    So, course of action ... let's see a redacted copy of the NtK (both sides, but leave any dates on it still showing), then we can help you adjust the standard template initial appeal to push APCOA towards an early cancellation. 
    Thanks. Will post it once received. So far, she's just had the screen notice, which got torn into very, very small pieces and binned, accompanied by much swearing.
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 29 March 2021 at 10:04AM
    No Biggie , the postal NTK PCN is likely to fail a POFA test , meaning no keeper liability , especially if that is you , the non driver !!

    Slowly slowly catchee monkee , keep tempers under control

    Apcoa are easy to beat as long as nobody blabs about who was driving

    The trust complaint can be made when the NTK PCN arrived in several weeks time , after day 29 following the event , without outing the driver (even if it's obvious)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.