We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
removing solicitors as executers while parents still alive
Comments
-
Keep_pedalling said:
That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright.gramy1 said:hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of the rest......if i am made executor then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs...
I wondered this. If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.
If so, could the old will just be destroyed?How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)0 -
Even if the distribution under a will is the same as under the intestate rules it is likely to be easier and quicker to administer the estate if there is a will (and in Scotland signficantly cheaper).Sea_Shell said:Keep_pedalling said:
That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright.gramy1 said:hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of the rest......if i am made executor then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs...
I wondered this. If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.
If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
Personally I would advise my parents just to pay the £500 plus VAT and get on with it. Yes I am sure it can be done cheaper but the savings won't be huge (unlike the savings that can by the executor doing probate themselves). In addition if desired, the solicitor is likely to be willing to still retain the wills at no cost.
I would also be sure to keep copies of the wills along with any correspondence with the solicitors. (Just in case the originals go missing.)0 -
naedanger said:
Even if the distribution under a will is the same as under the intestate rules it is likely to be easier and quicker to administer the estate if there is a will (and in Scotland signficantly cheaper).Sea_Shell said:Keep_pedalling said:
That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright.gramy1 said:hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of the rest......if i am made executor then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs...
I wondered this. If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.
If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
Personally I would advise my parents just to pay the £500 plus VAT and get on with it. Yes I am sure it can be done cheaper but the savings won't be huge (unlike the savings that can by the executor doing probate themselves). In addition if desired, the solicitor is likely to be willing to still retain the wills at no cost.
I would also be sure to keep copies of the wills along with any correspondence with the solicitors. (Just in case the originals go missing.)
I agree, but I was meaning in the immediate term, whilst a new will is being sorted, if it is the priority NOW to remove the current executors.How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)0 -
OK. I see your point. Personally I still wouldn't destroy the wills and in the short term would live with the risk of having to ask the executor to renounce their role (which I accept would have a cost and it is not certain they would agree - though they should be prepared to do so).Sea_Shell said:naedanger said:
Even if the distribution under a will is the same as under the intestate rules it is likely to be easier and quicker to administer the estate if there is a will (and in Scotland signficantly cheaper).Sea_Shell said:Keep_pedalling said:
That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright.gramy1 said:hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of the rest......if i am made executor then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs...
I wondered this. If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.
If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
Personally I would advise my parents just to pay the £500 plus VAT and get on with it. Yes I am sure it can be done cheaper but the savings won't be huge (unlike the savings that can by the executor doing probate themselves). In addition if desired, the solicitor is likely to be willing to still retain the wills at no cost.
I would also be sure to keep copies of the wills along with any correspondence with the solicitors. (Just in case the originals go missing.)
I agree, but I was meaning in the immediate term, whilst a new will is being sorted, if it is the priority NOW to remove the current executors.
1 -
yes they each own half the house ....i will need to check if joint tenants or tenants in common......is it better to be tenants in common ,,then my father passes his share direct to me and my mother has half instead of all going to my mother.....would this make any difference for tax purposes or any other financials gain ...thanks0
-
if we stay with the current solicitors we need to make new wills or can we make codicils to the old wills which i presume would be cheaper...i realize i nitpicking over only maybe £200 but hey i thought i would try ....hanks0
-
One stop gap solution is to draw up a DIY codicil to change the executors. It is a relatively simple document but will cover the situation of one parent dying before a new will is in place.
https://coronerscourtssupportservice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Factsheet-Codicil.pdf
1 -
If your parents are happy to change their wills and name you has their sole executor have a solicitor draw up a new will avoid any DIY options believe me you will be glad you did when the time comes to perform your role has executor.0
-
..If the wills are relatively simple, ie death of first person everything goes to spouse and on their passing it goes to a single beneficiary, then why not just DIY? (ensuring 2 witnesses who are not beneficiaries). Only thing to consider is if the final beneficiary passes before the last spouse.As a minimum you could do this as an interim while you considered more "professional" options?.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

