📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

removing solicitors as executers while parents still alive

124»

Comments

  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,040 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    gramy1 said:
    hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of  the rest......if i am made executor  then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs... 
    That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright. 

    I wondered this.   If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.

    If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • naedanger
    naedanger Posts: 3,105 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sea_Shell said:
    gramy1 said:
    hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of  the rest......if i am made executor  then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs... 
    That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright. 

    I wondered this.   If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.

    If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
    Even if the distribution under a will is the same as under the intestate rules it is likely to be easier and quicker to administer the estate if there is a will (and in Scotland signficantly cheaper).

    Personally I would advise my parents just to pay the £500 plus VAT and get on with it. Yes I am sure it can be done cheaper but the savings won't be huge (unlike the savings that can by the executor doing probate themselves). In addition if desired, the solicitor is likely to be willing to still retain the wills at no cost.

    I would also be sure to keep copies of the wills along with any correspondence with the solicitors. (Just in case the originals go missing.)
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,040 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    naedanger said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    gramy1 said:
    hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of  the rest......if i am made executor  then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs... 
    That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright. 

    I wondered this.   If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.

    If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
    Even if the distribution under a will is the same as under the intestate rules it is likely to be easier and quicker to administer the estate if there is a will (and in Scotland signficantly cheaper).

    Personally I would advise my parents just to pay the £500 plus VAT and get on with it. Yes I am sure it can be done cheaper but the savings won't be huge (unlike the savings that can by the executor doing probate themselves). In addition if desired, the solicitor is likely to be willing to still retain the wills at no cost.

    I would also be sure to keep copies of the wills along with any correspondence with the solicitors. (Just in case the originals go missing.)

    I agree, but I was meaning in the immediate term, whilst a new will is being sorted, if it is the priority NOW to remove the current executors.
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • naedanger
    naedanger Posts: 3,105 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Sea_Shell said:
    naedanger said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    gramy1 said:
    hi,,,at moment the solicitors take 1.5% of property and 3/4% of  the rest......if i am made executor  then after death i will still be able to use a solicitor if i need to but at much lower costs... 
    That might have been reasonable 25 years ago but house price inflation has made that very expensive. Do they own their house as joint tennants? If so it will not form part of the estate on the the first death, the survivor will automatically own it outright. 

    I wondered this.   If the house is the majority of the estate, and is owned as joint tenants, could the rules of intestacy actually work for OP situation, in the short term.

    If so, could the old will just be destroyed?
    Even if the distribution under a will is the same as under the intestate rules it is likely to be easier and quicker to administer the estate if there is a will (and in Scotland signficantly cheaper).

    Personally I would advise my parents just to pay the £500 plus VAT and get on with it. Yes I am sure it can be done cheaper but the savings won't be huge (unlike the savings that can by the executor doing probate themselves). In addition if desired, the solicitor is likely to be willing to still retain the wills at no cost.

    I would also be sure to keep copies of the wills along with any correspondence with the solicitors. (Just in case the originals go missing.)

    I agree, but I was meaning in the immediate term, whilst a new will is being sorted, if it is the priority NOW to remove the current executors.
    OK. I see your point. Personally I still wouldn't destroy the wills and in the short term would live with the risk of having to ask the executor to renounce their role (which I accept would have a cost and it is not certain they would agree - though they should be prepared to do so).

  • gramy1
    gramy1 Posts: 32 Forumite
    10 Posts
    yes they each own half the house ....i will need to check if joint tenants or tenants in common......is it better to be tenants in common ,,then my father passes his share direct to me and my mother has half instead of all going to my mother.....would this make any difference for tax purposes or any other financials gain ...thanks
  • gramy1
    gramy1 Posts: 32 Forumite
    10 Posts
    if we stay with the current solicitors we need to make new wills or can we make codicils to the old wills which i presume would be cheaper...i realize i nitpicking over only maybe £200 but  hey i thought i would try ....hanks


  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 21,151 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    One stop gap solution is to draw up a DIY codicil to change the executors. It is a relatively simple document but will cover the situation of one parent dying before a new will is in place.

    https://coronerscourtssupportservice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Factsheet-Codicil.pdf
  • jasdog
    jasdog Posts: 45 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Photogenic
    edited 17 March 2021 at 8:18AM
    If your parents are happy to change their wills and name you has their sole executor have a solicitor draw up a new will avoid any DIY options believe me you will be glad you did when the time comes to perform your role has executor.
  • Stubod
    Stubod Posts: 2,610 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    ..If the wills are relatively simple, ie death of first person everything goes to spouse and on their passing it goes to a single beneficiary, then why not just DIY? (ensuring 2 witnesses who are not beneficiaries). Only thing to consider is if the final beneficiary passes before the last spouse.
    As a minimum you could do this as an interim while you considered more "professional" options?
    .."It's everybody's fault but mine...."
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.