We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
2021 Budget. Self employed shafted again?
Comments
-
Companies take years to build and seconds to disintegrate to ashes. Hence why it's a job retention scheme. Rather than a welfare scheme as is the case in the US. Where employment law is non-existent. If companies were to go bust then the state is liable for unpaid wages, pay in lieu of notice and statutory redundancy. Catch 22.Pennywise said:
And furlough has looked after many employed at a level they never expected, and even better that the 50:50 rule nor the £50k limit applies to employees! Answers on a postcard please as to why employees get more support than self employed?SomeMadeUpName said:The reason that payment for the 4th SEISS is delayed a month is to give HMRC time to process 2019/20 tax returns submitted uupto the extended deadline and so bring in an extra 600,000 people to the scheme. Hardly shafted imo. The SEISS has looked after many self employed at a level they never expected.0 -
A se person with profits of £60k pays more tax/nic than an employee earning £50k. The latter gets 80% furlough, the former gets nothing.Grumpy_chap said:
Higher contributions to the welfare state - particularly NI contributions, but also income tax generally.Pennywise said:Answers on a postcard please as to why employees get more support than self employed?
A pensioner with a job gets 80% furlough despite not paying nic on their wages.
A part timer on £8k p.a. pays no nic but gets 80% furlough
The covid support makes no sense and NIC isn't the reason.0 -
Only if the employer agreed to put the employee on furlough though - many didn't. There are plenty of employees out there who were either laid off, made redundant, or were on zero hours contracts and so received no furlough,Pennywise said:
A se person with profits of £60k pays more tax/nic than an employee earning £50k. The latter gets 80% furlough, the former gets nothing.Grumpy_chap said:
Higher contributions to the welfare state - particularly NI contributions, but also income tax generally.Pennywise said:Answers on a postcard please as to why employees get more support than self employed?
A pensioner with a job gets 80% furlough despite not paying nic on their wages.
A part timer on £8k p.a. pays no nic but gets 80% furlough
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
