We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
RBS.co.uk keeps your data active after account close.
Comments
-
EarthBoy said:
Ten years is nothing. First Direct keep records of former customers going back to 1 October 1989, i.e. when they first opened for business. Their joining bonus is for first-time customers only, so if you've ever had a previous account with them they will have a record of you.someone said:10 years seems excessive and beyond many statutory requirements. Are you sure you don't have any products with RBS (or NatWest?)? Mabe an old savings account with a nil balance?Records of customers and the data they hold on you are two seperate things if i am not mistaken?Have nothing wrong with my name being held on a database forever, its the data (ie : security questios/ passwords)I believe that data protection act needs looking at again and ammending espeically with all the huge data leaks we have seen over the years.I dont even enjoy letting sites have my cookies though0 -
I disagree with that, as I have to use different email addresses for both organisations, otherwise their computers get confusedRG2015 said:
There will not be any connection between data held at RBS, NatWest any other RBS/NatWest Group companies such as Ulster Bank.someone said:10 years seems excessive and beyond many statutory requirements. Are you sure you don't have any products with RBS (or NatWest?)? Mabe an old savings account with a nil balance?I consider myself to be a male feminist. Is that allowed?2 -
charb87 said:EarthBoy said:
Ten years is nothing. First Direct keep records of former customers going back to 1 October 1989, i.e. when they first opened for business. Their joining bonus is for first-time customers only, so if you've ever had a previous account with them they will have a record of you.someone said:10 years seems excessive and beyond many statutory requirements. Are you sure you don't have any products with RBS (or NatWest?)? Mabe an old savings account with a nil balance?Records of customers and the data they hold on you are two seperate things if i am not mistaken?Have nothing wrong with my name being held on a database forever, its the data (ie : security questios/ passwords)I believe that data protection act needs looking at again and ammending espeically with all the huge data leaks we have seen over the years.I dont even enjoy letting sites have my cookies thoughNo, your name is personal data about you, as is your date of birth (and both would be needed to properly identify you as neither are unique in themselves).Your passwords, and maybe your security answers, however, should be unique to that site, and therefore of no use to a hacker, since the accounts themselves have been closed.Eco Miser
Saving money for well over half a century2 -
damn so me using my same security question answer is not advisable :O
0 -
Certainly some people use totally fictitious answers.Also don't always choose the same questions if you have a choice.Eco Miser
Saving money for well over half a century0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards