We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Advice choosing between 2 properties

apyabt
Posts: 12 Forumite

Hi there, Just wanted some advice regarding a future house purchase.
My wife and I have put in an offer for a property for £315k on a new build development. It is a 3 bed, 3 story townhouse, centre terrace in a large-ish UK city. Another property has come up on the same development that is up for £375k, same build specs, rooms etc, but with an extra 130sqf extra throughout the property and an end of terrace.
£315k = 1150sqf, £375k = 1280sqf
£315k = 1150sqf, £375k = 1280sqf
Now, we think that £60k for an extra 130sqf is pretty steep, however it does have these other pros:
* 130 sqf extra space
* 1 neighbour rather than 2
* Larger garden
* North facing living room rather than south facing (no TV glare)
* Kitchen island and better layout on the ground floor
* More storage
* Larger front balcony (enough for another dining space rather than just a bench)
* 2 car parking spaces instead of 1
It would be great to get some input from other people who have had to make a similar decision. Are these benefits and the slight increase in space worth £60k? We are first time buyers so have never had to consider these things before. Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
-
Is it still only 3 beds?2024 wins: *must start comping again!*0
-
If at all possible I’d try for the more expensive property. The fact that you get 2 parking spaces too is so much better.We had a similar dilemma many years ago, both properties were 4 bed and similar but one was 50k more, my gut said go for cheaper, we don’t need a study etc., don’t over stretch ourselves, we spent 10 happy years there but have now moved to the exact property we considered all those years ago, still cost us the 50k too plus the added expense of 2nd round of Sdlt fees and solicitor fees, if I could turn back the clock I would have spent the extra money on our preferred home.2
-
I'm in London and would think this would be well worth it. Having lived in a newish three-storey townhouse, try to have your own bedroom on the first floor. Upstairs is for kids, guests or office space.
The extra parking space is worth a lot. If you don't need it you can rent it out.
If you can afford this as your first house, you'll really future-proof yourself for a long time to come.
I know perfectly well that this site is about saving money, but we need to remember that economy should be our servant not our god.There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker1 -
UnderOffer said:If at all possible I’d try for the more expensive property. The fact that you get 2 parking spaces too is so much better.We had a similar dilemma many years ago, both properties were 4 bed and similar but one was 50k more, my gut said go for cheaper, we don’t need a study etc., don’t over stretch ourselves, we spent 10 happy years there but have now moved to the exact property we considered all those years ago, still cost us the 50k too plus the added expense of 2nd round of Sdlt fees and solicitor fees, if I could turn back the clock I would have spent the extra money on our preferred home.
That's the way I'm leaning to be honest (my wife might take some persuading though). I think we will regret it in a few years if we don't go for the more expensive property. I might have a chat with the agent on Monday and see if we can get them down to £360k and go from there. Thanks for sharing your experience, really appreciate it.1 -
zagubov said:I'm in London and would think this would be well worth it. Having lived in a newish three-storey townhouse, try to have your own bedroom on the first floor. Upstairs is for kids, guests or office space.
The extra parking space is worth a lot. If you don't need it you can rent it out.
If you can afford this as your first house, you'll really future-proof yourself for a long time to come.
I know perfectly well that this site is about saving money, but we need to remember that economy should be our servant not our god.
Agree with your comment, sometimes you have to spend money to save money. We have spoken about the smaller property as well and would want to do some work on it, whereas the larger property already has those things.
I'm just concerned about making an offer on something that is over priced and losing equity if it isn't deemed as worth the extra £60k on the market in the future, considering the small size difference. Would you say an offer for £360k would be fair?0 -
I'd compare against older houses. The minute you move in, it'll be "second hand" and it's those you'll need to consider if you ever move. Long term, it's unlikely to be worth more cos it's a newer build.
I was the second owner of a house once. Buyers had paid an enormous price tag at the time (400k), well over market value elsewhere. When they came to sell, I bought 8 years later for around 35k more. Other properties had risen over 50% and the Zoopla valuation was around £150-200k over (I forget). Not saying take a blind bit of notice what Zoopla says, but just an example of how the general area had increased.
At that sort of price level, it sounds like a much bigger increase for the same number of bedrooms. The figures don't mean a lot to me, it would be about layout and how spacious the rooms feel. Do you have any links or floor plans to share?2024 wins: *must start comping again!*2 -
I would pay the extra to be semi detached rather than mid terraced and get the larger house and extra parking space.
Having suffered with noisy neighbours in the past we would want as few attached neighbours as possible!5 -
Is the rear garden south or west facing on the more expensive one - that would sway me...2
-
You are paying £275 per sq ft for the smaller house. The extra 130 sqft are costing nearly £500 psf. Bear in mind that both houses have the same electric systems, central heating etc, so the extra footage is rather cheap to build. You may therefore be able to get more discount on the larger property. Just a thought. Plot size is also important.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards