We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Texas Freeze Raises Cost Of Charging A Tesla To $900
Options
Comments
-
RichardD1970 said:Hunyani_Flight_825 said:I would still argue it is far more likely to happen in the UK as opposed to Texas. I personally think our grid is flying by the seat of its pants (no new nuclear etc) and a lack of provision for increases in load post 2030. Power stations take years to get off the drawing board never mind construction.National Grid would disagree with you.0
-
missile said:"If anything, it shows how dangerous deregulation and isolationism are." That would be Brexit?
If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.0 -
BBC reporting of one Texas homeowner who has a home electric bill of $3000.
It didn't say for how long a period, but suggested it was racked up in a very short period due to supply and demand pricing. Smart meter anyone?0 -
AdrianC said:Herzlos said:AdrianC said:Herzlos said:The main difference is that the UK gets cold weather every year and more or less plans for it.Texas doesn't..
There's headlines giving temps just below 0 in Texas. They're in Fahrenheit... They're about -20degC... And they normally don't even get near freezing.
The UK VERY rarely gets -20degC, and it would cause chaos if we did.
Can I remind you of the headlines a week or so ago?
https://blog.metoffice.gov.uk/2021/02/11/record-low-temperature-for-the-uk-this-millennium/
And when it DOES happen, it's in places like the Scottish Highlands, where they're far more used to low temperatures, snow and ice. Can you imagine the chaos if that hit London and the Home Counties...?
I didn't say it happened often, but I certainly remember it getting cold around 2010 because I had to work from home for about 3 weeks because the trains just gave up, but I don't remember any power or utility failures. The roads were fine as well but I remember my windscreen fluid (good to -20oC) froze so I decided not to travel very far.
Compare that with Texas, now...
0 -
We have this old chestnut............
0 -
Herzlos said:AdrianC said:Herzlos said:AdrianC said:The UK VERY rarely gets -20degC, and it would cause chaos if we did.
Can I remind you of the headlines a week or so ago?
https://blog.metoffice.gov.uk/2021/02/11/record-low-temperature-for-the-uk-this-millennium/
And when it DOES happen, it's in places like the Scottish Highlands, where they're far more used to low temperatures, snow and ice. Can you imagine the chaos if that hit London and the Home Counties...?
The lowest temperature recorded anywhere in the UK that winter was -21.3degC at Altnaharra, in what's recognised as the coldest winter for the UK since 1659. Altnaharra is the very definition of the back end of nowhere, 15 miles south of the north coast of Scotland, 70 miles north of Inverness...
The SE of England had record lows of -14.2degC at Farnborough, -12 in Bedfordshire, and -10.5 in Gravesend.
Heathrow and Gatwick both closed, train services were halted all over the country, and people had to spend the night at Brum coach station, with average temps for December of -1degC - the first time ever a negative mean for the month had been recorded.
Large parts of NI and Wales had widespread water supply failures.
January had average temps of +3.8degC. February was one of the mildest of the previous century, but the Highlands had heavy snow again in March.
Oh, and the UK still got 30% of its electricity from coal in 2010, vs virtually none now.
0 -
Made me laugh people jabbering on about not being able to charge Teslas - modern fuel pumps need electricity Billy-Bob, you're not fueling your 10mpg penis extension truck either.Texas' problem is them trying to be isolationist, they're not in the US national grid system (they have 3, an East, West and Texas) and so it came to bite. Literally 2 weeks ago, Texas Republicans were gathering support to secede from the US, now they are begging for federal funds.0
-
daveyjp said:Most of UK turbines are at sea.
Onshore Turbines 8,663 Onshore Operational Capacity (MW) 13,739.625 Offshore Turbines 2,292 Offshore Operational Capacity (MW) 10,415.
0 -
lemondrops69 said:Since when?
Onshore Turbines 8,663 Onshore Operational Capacity (MW) 13,739.625 Offshore Turbines 2,292 Offshore Operational Capacity (MW) 10,415.
0 -
daivid said:lemondrops69 said:Since when?
Onshore Turbines 8,663 Onshore Operational Capacity (MW) 13,739.625 Offshore Turbines 2,292 Offshore Operational Capacity (MW) 10,415.
Onshore 13,739MW
Offshore 10,415MW
This is installed capacity
However, off shore turbines are much bigger. The onshore fleet is older, many are sub mega watt, 650/750kW, this is what bumps the numbers up. Whitelee is the biggest onshore UK farm, running Siemens 2.3MW turbines and on output of 539MW. The offshore fleet is much newer and they are all multi-mega watt and had turbines, generally now 3.6MW. The largest UK offshore wind generates 659 MW and has less turbines than Whitelee
So yes the offshore turbines are 3 times as powerful, more in fact 650kW x 5 = 3.25MW, efficiency is less of a factor.
Oh, BTW you can run turbines in sub-zero temps, they do in Sweden, they just need to be winterised. Obviously the ones in Texas wouldnt have been
2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards