We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
Fraudulent claim against me, help!
Comments
-
At least the OP can prove they were away.
Pity the poor sap who has no alibi for the alleged incident. What then for them?How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)0 -
Guilt or innocence is only an issue in criminal cases. In civil cases, ultimately a judge has to decide whose version of events is more plausible. There is no presumption of fault on either side.Stubod said:Sea_Shell said:At least the OP can prove they were away.
Pity the poor sap who has no alibi for the alleged incident. What then for them?
..guilty until proved innocent obviously!?
0 -
But the car involved was still at their home... With a pet sitter there...Sea_Shell said:At least the OP can prove they were away.
Pity the poor sap who has no alibi for the alleged incident. What then for them?
Life in the slow lane1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards