PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice on speeding up purchase

Options
13»

Comments

  • leypt1
    leypt1 Posts: 170 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    davidmcn said:
    Slithery said:
    So it doesn't say no annoying pets. It says any pets which may be annoying.
    Annoying isn't a definitive term, a neighbour could say that your pet is annoying them for any reason whether valid or not.
    It would be interpreted objectively, like any other sort of nuisance, somebody merely saying that "I find chihuahuas annoying" isn't going to cut it.

    And obviously if your pet is causing an actual nuisance, your neighbours will have remedies no matter what your titles say.
    This is basically what my solicitor says. So...we shouldn't worry about the clause after all??
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    leypt1 said:
    Slithery said:
    So it doesn't say no annoying pets. It says any pets which may be annoying.
    Annoying isn't a definitive term, a neighbour could say that your pet is annoying them for any reason whether valid or not.
    Do not go ahead until you have permission for the pet from the freeholder. You should read the problems that another poster has experienced trying to get permission....

    Thank you. We did initially suggest this, but our solicitor said that it would be difficult/impractical for the freeholder to give permission in advance for a pet which hasn't had a chance to be annoying yet.

    I think we'll try again, just for safety.

    Thats worse then, you move in, get the dog, and then on a whim 3 months later the freeholder decides its annoying and you are in a  world of legal trouble when they dont give permission, rather than them having to rescind permission.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Whose responsibility is the maintenance of the roof?  Shared external areas? 
  • leypt1
    leypt1 Posts: 170 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hi,

    Thanks for all replies and sorry I went silent - lost the will TBH.

    Update:
    - There has recently been a new freeholder. They returned a new LPE1 which contains all of the same discrepancies as the old one
    -The sellers responded to our pre-exchange pack enquiries. Our solicitor took 9 days to forward on a verbatim email from them with their responses, despite us chasing. His email didn't contain any actual interpretation or advice
    -We realised we were no further forward than we were and decided to pull out of the purchase, as we're worried about potential conflicts with the freeholder over i) whether they're owed a service charge ii) pets, and can't wait forever for this to be resolved (we're now at 6 months and counting)

    The worst part is not knowing whether we've blown all of this out of proportion, because our solicitor takes weeks to action things and then strenuously avoids giving us advice. He's a partner at his firm, recommended to us by my BIL as "the most trustworthy solicitor he's ever met", so not sure how we could have avoided this, really.

    We've been viewing freehold houses. Some promising options. Thanks again for all advice on this thread. Sorry it's been a depressing outcome.


  • teachfast
    teachfast Posts: 633 Forumite
    500 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Sorry to hear about the outcome for you. 

    Yet again, conveyancing solicitors not covering themselves in glory. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.