PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Things left in loft after completion

Options
1235789

Comments

  • KiwiCoop
    KiwiCoop Posts: 116 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    If you weren't given the option of sorting it yourself then tell her to do one (after talking to your solicitor perhaps...).  I've bought 20 houses over the last ten years, half of them had all manner of stuff in the roof space but it never occurred to me to try getting money out of the previous owner for getting shot of it.  
  • A_Lert
    A_Lert Posts: 609 Forumite
    500 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Any news?
    I think it would be entirely reasonable for the new owners to not want to let the old owners in to remove left-behind stuff, but instead want to hire their own choice of professionals to do work in what is now their own home.
    Of course it's entirely possible there's virtually nothing and the new owners are just trying to scam. Which is why OP needs evidence. But since OP didn't check themselves, they've got no evidence - not even their own statement - that the loft wasn't full of junk when they sold it.
  • A_Lert said:
    Any news?
    I think it would be entirely reasonable for the new owners to not want to let the old owners in to remove left-behind stuff, but instead want to hire their own choice of professionals to do work in what is now their own home.
    Of course it's entirely possible there's virtually nothing and the new owners are just trying to scam. Which is why OP needs evidence. But since OP didn't check themselves, they've got no evidence - not even their own statement - that the loft wasn't full of junk when they sold it.
    I agree.
    If they want to hire someone else they can pay for it as they are not mitigating their costs
  • Nik85
    Nik85 Posts: 9 Forumite
    First Post
    So I wrote back offering to clear the items myself if she would provide me with an inventory and pictures. Alternatively I offered half the requested amount if she wanted to go ahead and arrange removal herself. I thought this was more than reasonable. I have received a letter back saying 14 days til court proceedings as she won't let me clear it myself and wants full £600. A picture was provided which showed a couple of items (not mine) in the loft which certainly do not require a bloody skip to remove. Stuck with what to do now... I accept the loft should have been empty, a mistake I'll never make again! But I am willing to remove it! 
  • youth_leader
    youth_leader Posts: 2,912 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So sorry Nik85. 
    £216 saved 24 October 2014
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 18,888 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As she has (rather stupidly) provided you with evidence that the items requiring removal do not need to be skipped, you could use this as a defence if she does take you to court. Unless she has proper written quotes from at least 2 contractors with an inventory of items to be removed, I cannot see her succeeding. But unfortunately offering her £300 (unless it was a without prejudice offer) may result in a court finding in her favour for that amount.

    As advice/warning to others (apart from the obvious of ensuring the property you sell is completely empty) ask for an inventory and photographs of the offending items and at least 2 written quotes from bona fide contractors before offering to pay for their removal. DO NOT offer arbitrary amounts as goodwill, and if you ever do so, always mark the offer "without prejudice".
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • Nik85
    Nik85 Posts: 9 Forumite
    First Post
    I did write "without prejudice save as to costs" on the letter as advised by an online solicitor. I'm completely flabbergasted that she is refusing to provide an inventory unless I pay to have someone do one? I realise it should be empty (before anyone starts) but I'm trying to resolve this and she just won't budge. 
  • houghton91
    houghton91 Posts: 104 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    She sounds like a horrible human being. Surely she must provide proof that her removal costs will be close to what she's claiming in order to do so? It sounds like she's trying to scare you.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.