We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Shall we skip searches?
coronacaution
Posts: 16 Forumite
Hi there, we've had an offer accepted on a 3 year old house, on a local new build redrow estate. We know the area well, have a number of friends on the same estate, have looked at all the local planning permissions to understand the estate development plans and I grew up around the corner for 20 years until buying first home and moving away.
My question is, is it possible to/or unnecessary in this instance to not ask conveyancer to do the searches? Im aware of the current delays when it comes to this part of the home buying process at the minute so it was a thought that crossed my mind to speed things up. Wondered what others thought about this if they were in my shoes! Thanks.
My question is, is it possible to/or unnecessary in this instance to not ask conveyancer to do the searches? Im aware of the current delays when it comes to this part of the home buying process at the minute so it was a thought that crossed my mind to speed things up. Wondered what others thought about this if they were in my shoes! Thanks.
0
Comments
-
If it's a cash purchase, yes it's up to you, and I would say the risks are tiny. If you're buying with a mortgage then your lender will at least want search insurance.1
-
Do you need a mortgage or is this a cash purchase?If you need a mortgage then you lender will insist on either searches or search insurance.1
-
The mortgage company will likely need some of the searches doing. You can skip the rest if you want.0
-
If you're a cash buyer then you can skip them. A relative skipped them when they were buying a 3 year old house a couple of years ago, same with survey.0
-
Sorry I missed that info, we're buying with a mortgage. Didn't think about the lender wanting that info as security for them, that makes sense. Thank you for the replies. We'll see if we can get away with running the minimum searches for the lender only.0
-
Depending on where you live, searches aren’t so slow now. We only waited 7 days in Leeds.1
-
There is no minimum searches, lenders will want all searches completed so that they know what the risk is to their investment. You could check to see if they would accept search indemnity insurance. My searches in Worcestershire took 9 days to come back.coronacaution said:Sorry I missed that info, we're buying with a mortgage. Didn't think about the lender wanting that info as security for them, that makes sense. Thank you for the replies. We'll see if we can get away with running the minimum searches for the lender only.1 -
Delays were caused by the rush to beat the stamp duty deadline. All will blow over now and settle down again. As volumes return to a more manageable level.coronacaution said:Im aware of the current delays when it comes to this part of the home buying process at the minute so it was a thought that crossed my mind to speed things up.2 -
No they don't, and few have a blanket refusal to accepting search indemnity insurance (after all, lenders are only concerned about the tiny risk of suffering a shortfall on repossession because of something which would have been revealed in the searches, rather than any of the practical hassle such things might cause an owner). It seems to be more the solicitors who have difficulty in streamlining procedures.Irishpearce26 said:
There is no minimum searches, lenders will want all searches completed so that they know what the risk is to their investment.coronacaution said:Sorry I missed that info, we're buying with a mortgage. Didn't think about the lender wanting that info as security for them, that makes sense. Thank you for the replies. We'll see if we can get away with running the minimum searches for the lender only.0 -
Ditto what others are saying.
Flood risk and estate planning aside - the solicitor (and you) needs to know who owns which piece of road. For example how do you know if the piece of land outside your house is private vs council managed and whether there is a risk that legally you cannot access the property because you'll need to trespass private land etc. Solicitor can't do they job as per law society guidelines and you're at risk too.
It's £150ish, not worth the hassle in trying to avoid it.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards