We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lockdown has caused £1000's of damage to our car due to lack of use. What can we do?
Options
Comments
-
As its a known fault I'd search the Skoda forums for advice. I had to contact a turbo specialist last year who could recondition a turbo for far cheaper than replacing it.Example, https://www.midlandturbo.com/collections/popular-turbochargers/products/turbocharger-789016
0 -
peskyparttimer said:Not when that "lack of use" is enforced by the government and Police surely. "taking the car for a 60 mile run to stop it seizing up officer" don't somehow think that would be classed as an essential journey. Its been started up and revved on the driveway for a few minutes to bring it up to temperature but obviously because its not been subjected to any real load the turbo hasn't been required to produce any boost.
1 -
wongataa said:peskyparttimer said:Not when that "lack of use" is enforced by the government and Police surely. "taking the car for a 60 mile run to stop it seizing up officer" don't somehow think that would be classed as an essential journey. Its been started up and revved on the driveway for a few minutes to bring it up to temperature but obviously because its not been subjected to any real load the turbo hasn't been required to produce any boost.
Signature on holiday for two weeks1 -
mattyprice4004 said:daveyjp said:Components on cars fail, once out of warranty the responsibility for repairs lies with the owner. Turbos are known to fail and they are expensive to repair, two good reasons to avoid them.
Last car was on the original turbo at 290,000 miles, current car is on 195,000 miles (also original) and the 'work car' is just about to tick over to 200,000 miles with the original turbo too.
Can't see the issue myself, if it's a crap design that doesn't mean they're all bad.
First two are both Garrett GT2260V and the third is a GT15.
Turbos fail is a true statement. My last turbo petrol had a new turbo under warranty at 15,000 miles, 12 months old.They are expensive when they go wrong is also true as the OP is finding out.0 -
peskyparttimer said:Not when that "lack of use" is enforced by the government and Police surely. "taking the car for a 60 mile run to stop it seizing up officer" don't somehow think that would be classed as an essential journey. Its been started up and revved on the driveway for a few minutes to bring it up to temperature but obviously because its not been subjected to any real load the turbo hasn't been required to produce any boost.0
-
Turbo replacement on my car cost £600 all in from local mechanic. VW cost was over £2000. So there are much cheaper ways of fixing your problemRemember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0
-
daveyjp said:mattyprice4004 said:daveyjp said:Components on cars fail, once out of warranty the responsibility for repairs lies with the owner. Turbos are known to fail and they are expensive to repair, two good reasons to avoid them.
Last car was on the original turbo at 290,000 miles, current car is on 195,000 miles (also original) and the 'work car' is just about to tick over to 200,000 miles with the original turbo too.
Can't see the issue myself, if it's a crap design that doesn't mean they're all bad.
First two are both Garrett GT2260V and the third is a GT15.
Turbos fail is a true statement. My last turbo petrol had a new turbo under warranty at 15,000 miles, 12 months old.They are expensive when they go wrong is also true as the OP is finding out.
VAG TSI reliability seems patchy, there were issues with earlier variants of the 1.4 TSI in the Golf though seemed to be resolved with latter versions. The DSG gearboxes in the lower powered TSI engines also appear to be rather suspect for long term reliability.
I'm actually considering a Leon or Golf at the moment (used) but the patchy reliability on the TSI engines makes me hesitate. In fairness both Ecoboost (Ford) and Vauxhall's more recent 1.4T engines seemto have their own share of issues so I wonder is the root of the problems forced induction being coupled with increasingly smaller (1.0,1.2l) engines.....for context I my 54 plate focus 1.8 (petrol) is doing around 5 miles a week on average since Covid began...cold starts, gets driven hard every time and yet just keeps going and going.
I also don't recall there being many issues with older turbocharged cars when the engine sizes were bigger..with exception of some TFSI VAG engines that liked a drink of oil every now and then0 -
I bought a van just before the lockdown last year. I’ve had to pay tax, insurance, mot etc. However anything caused by lack of use will be entirely offset by the reduced fuel consumption
And yes, it has been serviced and Mot’d during the pandemic.1 -
I rarely drive my car (naturally aspirated) more than a 6 mile journey. Such use is not unusual. And while I know frequent short trips wears the car out more than the same mileage in longer faster trips, I wouldn't consider it normal for a car to outright break just because it never gets a dual carriageway run.Was the issue known about before last March? If so, were you informed of it and of the need to do sufficiently long drives to prevent the turbo siezing? If not, then I wouldn't rule out you having a case. Known fault present since manufacture after all.0
-
This has to be a wind up? No one was banned from driving to go and get food from a supermarket however far you would need to travel to it!Be happy, it's the greatest wealth0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards