DCBL legal CCJ saga (case won)

hju456

Congratulations, you were given some sterling advice and followed it. Well done to all that contributed.👏👏

Johnersh

Hiding in plain sight! So they were, excellent. 

Coupon-mad

Jsalomonuk said:

Hi thank you to everyone that gave me advice, The judge agreed with all my points, the claim was stuck out and the CCJ set aside and DCBL to pay my costs, 
They did state during the hearing that Terry szmit will bring fresh proceedings against me, So I will start a fresh post when that happens. 

Yay, claim fully struck out as well as the CCJ wiped and the costs awarded back to you!  Nicely done.  The CCJ will disappear, maybe next month it will no longer show up and you should get a cheque shortly from the Claimant or DCBLegal.

Another DCBLegal / Terry Szmidt one bites the dust!

Castle

Jsalomonuk said:

Hi thank you to everyone that gave me advice, The judge agreed with all my points, the claim was stuck out and the CCJ set aside and DCBL to pay my costs, 
They did state during the hearing that Terry szmit will bring fresh proceedings against me, So I will start a fresh post when that happens. 

At which point you can enter a Counter claim for GDPR/DPA damages in respect of Mr Szmit "selling" your "debt" to the limited company contrary to the Kadoe agreement. (DCBL has very helpfully confirmed what his/the Ltd company's intentions are in para 4 of their WS).

Johnersh

@castle the debt was never sold, that's why it's the wrong claimant. 

It is still potentially a data breach as the company has clearly been processing personal data which was never a company asset acquired on the incorporation. Their witness evidence does reflect that. 

Castle

Johnersh said:

@castle the debt was never sold, that's why it's the wrong claimant. 

It is still potentially a data breach as the company has clearly been processing personal data which was never a company asset acquired on the incorporation. Their witness evidence does reflect that. 

Agreed....hence the inverted commas

However there are two data breaches here, one by Mr Szmit, (who has personal liability), and one by the company.