DCBL legal CCJ saga (case won)

blackdog2220

yes short and sweet , you can twist knife later , but you must include a "by xx/xx/2021 "
I would have included your bank account number and sort code , and make it obvious that you do not trust there cheques , 

KeithP

I would not include "without prejudice" in that letter.

D_P_Dance

Personally. I would make life as difficult as possible for them.  Go for the jugular.

blackdog2220

KeithP said:

I would not include "without prejudice" in that letter.

yes agreed no without prejudice , as you are not "bartering" for damages (yet!!!!!) , and a normal letter can be shown to the judge showing terry towel and DCBL as they truly are 

Umkomaas

Without prejudice

With that as a header ....

this will pass before the courts for a judge to see

..... that's going to give you some difficulty!

Best check out what you're putting when using such legal phrases. 

nosferatu1001

WP save as to costs, so you can show it to the court
You need to read that final para...its not great. 

Le_Kirk

Jsalomonuk said:

"Without prejudice

 I am writing in response to your recent letter dated 10/02/21 discussing the fact that DCBL presented me with a letter that contained an 'error of fact' and notwithstanding the client is now prepared to agree set aside judgment without payment.

This case as it stands is that due to the conduct of DCBL and its client I am down have already expended [or spent] £255 for the initial set aside. My credit rating has suffered costing more money.

Unless I am reimbursed the £255 and set aside granted then this will pass before the courts for a judge to see and if the hearing proceeds and you will incur my attendance and other costs too"

As advised by others, I would remove "without prejudice" but I would also add, as @nosferatu1001 says that you want the underlying case discontinued.  I would also modify this.  I would also sort this out maybe add will.

Jsalomonuk

Umkomaas said:

Without prejudice

With that as a header ....

this will pass before the courts for a judge to see

..... that's going to give you some difficulty!

Best check out what you're putting when using such legal phrases. 

so my English written skills are about that of a 10 year old, i have mentioned this before, this is not where i excel hence why I'm on here. 
i don't have a bloody clue about most of this henz why I'm asking for help here. 
me posting here IS me checking if what I've written is correct. 
so to clarify 
DO not put without prejudice. 
but the rest makes sense ? 

blackdog2220

"DO not put without prejudice. "

without prejudice.  means that you cannot show it to the judge , see the letter they sent you , offering to pay the setaside , they dont want you showing that to a judge 


I am sure a regular on here will compose a nice letter 

PS , there letter , is it saying DCBL will pay the £100 or there client will pay the setaside , IE whos accepting the blame 

Le_Kirk

.... and we understand and are helping you.  Just make the changes that regulars have suggested and then post up on here your final draft for checking before you send it.