We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Car/bike accident not at fault.
Options

Cazzaroo
Posts: 143 Forumite

Hi,
My husband (car driver) was involved in an accident with a cyclist. The cyclist was coming down a hill at speed and took his chance going through a red light. My husband pulled forward on green and the cyclist hit the driver side door hard, smashing his window and making quite a big dent in the door. We had witnesses and they provided reports to our insurance company. A police report was done, too. The police wrote to us saying that there was no evidence of dangerous driving etc. The cyclist had superficial injuries but was admitted into hospital as a precaution. The cyclist had no insurance. My husband had to pay £200 excess and now his renewal premium is eye watering. The insurance company have said that the reports from witnesses back my husband up but they need to recover the costs somehow and it's with their team and may take up to a year. They've not said if we will get our £200 back. They did mention about setting up a payment plan with the cyclist. Are they within their rights to reclaim this from the uninsured cyclist? What are our options regarding renewal?
Thanks in advance.
Caz
My husband (car driver) was involved in an accident with a cyclist. The cyclist was coming down a hill at speed and took his chance going through a red light. My husband pulled forward on green and the cyclist hit the driver side door hard, smashing his window and making quite a big dent in the door. We had witnesses and they provided reports to our insurance company. A police report was done, too. The police wrote to us saying that there was no evidence of dangerous driving etc. The cyclist had superficial injuries but was admitted into hospital as a precaution. The cyclist had no insurance. My husband had to pay £200 excess and now his renewal premium is eye watering. The insurance company have said that the reports from witnesses back my husband up but they need to recover the costs somehow and it's with their team and may take up to a year. They've not said if we will get our £200 back. They did mention about setting up a payment plan with the cyclist. Are they within their rights to reclaim this from the uninsured cyclist? What are our options regarding renewal?
Thanks in advance.
Caz
Treat others how you would like to be treated. 🤞
0
Comments
-
I believe insurers can pursue their costs from others, hopefully this should include your excess. Ask about the possibility of reclaiming your costs.
1 -
Cazzaroo said:it's with their team and may take up to a year. They've not said if we will get our £200 back. They did mention about setting up a payment plan with the cyclist. Are they within their rights to reclaim this from the uninsured cyclist? What are our options regarding renewal?
Your husband had a legal claim for their losses from the cyclist, if they are insured or not is irrelevant to the right of recovery but may change the prospects of a recovery being possible. By claiming off his insurance his insurers have inherited that right and so will be pursuing the cyclist for their losses. They will inevitably ask if the cyclist had any form of insurance that may cover them like bike insurance or home contents insurance.
If they do have insurance it should be a relatively straight forward process other than for the whole covid situation. If they don't they will try to ascertain if it is financially viable to pursue the cyclist, they could agree a payment plan as mentioned, it could be they are well off and can afford to pay it off in once or it could be they are unemployed drowning in debt and only able to offer 50p a month which the insurer will decide is not economic to pursue.
Your uninsured losses, including your excess, is also recoverable from the cyclist. If you have legal expenses insurance then your insurers should appoint someone to do this for you. Sometimes the insurers will deal with your excess for free if its your only uninsured loss. If not then allow the insurer to deal with their losses first and after they've come to a position then ask the outcome and if successful contact the cyclist or their insurers about your excess.
The years come in with a payment plan; only when your insurers get their moneys back does it become a non-fault claim... depending on the amount of the claim and the financial position of the cyclist the plans can be fairly long.1 -
Was it actually a cyclist or just some random on a bike?
Many actual cyclists have third party insurance through things like membership of a club or British Cycling or similar (I pay about £35 a year for £10m liability) - they should check.
Even if it's just some random on a bike, they may have third party cover through something like home insurance - they should check1 -
Sandtree said:Cazzaroo said:it's with their team and may take up to a year. They've not said if we will get our £200 back. They did mention about setting up a payment plan with the cyclist. Are they within their rights to reclaim this from the uninsured cyclist? What are our options regarding renewal?
Your husband had a legal claim for their losses from the cyclist, if they are insured or not is irrelevant to the right of recovery but may change the prospects of a recovery being possible. By claiming off his insurance his insurers have inherited that right and so will be pursuing the cyclist for their losses. They will inevitably ask if the cyclist had any form of insurance that may cover them like bike insurance or home contents insurance.
If they do have insurance it should be a relatively straight forward process other than for the whole covid situation. If they don't they will try to ascertain if it is financially viable to pursue the cyclist, they could agree a payment plan as mentioned, it could be they are well off and can afford to pay it off in once or it could be they are unemployed drowning in debt and only able to offer 50p a month which the insurer will decide is not economic to pursue.
Your uninsured losses, including your excess, is also recoverable from the cyclist. If you have legal expenses insurance then your insurers should appoint someone to do this for you. Sometimes the insurers will deal with your excess for free if its your only uninsured loss. If not then allow the insurer to deal with their losses first and after they've come to a position then ask the outcome and if successful contact the cyclist or their insurers about your excess.
The years come in with a payment plan; only when your insurers get their moneys back does it become a non-fault claim... depending on the amount of the claim and the financial position of the cyclist the plans can be fairly long.Treat others how you would like to be treated. 🤞0 -
Deleted_User said:Was it actually a cyclist or just some random on a bike?
Many actual cyclists have third party insurance through things like membership of a club or British Cycling or similar (I pay about £35 a year for £10m liability) - they should check.
Even if it's just some random on a bike, they may have third party cover through something like home insurance - they should check
Thank you.Treat others how you would like to be treated. 🤞0 -
Cazzaroo said:Deleted_User said:Was it actually a cyclist or just some random on a bike?
Many actual cyclists have third party insurance through things like membership of a club or British Cycling or similar (I pay about £35 a year for £10m liability) - they should check.
Even if it's just some random on a bike, they may have third party cover through something like home insurance - they should check
Thank you.0 -
williamgriffin said:Cazzaroo said:Deleted_User said:Was it actually a cyclist or just some random on a bike?
Many actual cyclists have third party insurance through things like membership of a club or British Cycling or similar (I pay about £35 a year for £10m liability) - they should check.
Even if it's just some random on a bike, they may have third party cover through something like home insurance - they should check
Thank you.Treat others how you would like to be treated. 🤞0 -
Hi,
Following message received 5/1/22 received from solicitor:
The Defendant has not filed a Defence within the time allowed under the Court rules and so I have today applied to the Court for a Default Judgement in your favour.I will let you know as soon as I hear further from the Court.
Following message received from Claims Handler at Insurance company:In relation to your accident from the 19.11.2020, I can confirm I have contacted our panel solicitors; Carpenters, for their present position on your file, they advised me that they have passed your file to their litigation team in order to issue court proceedings against the Third party, I have been advised that Carpenters will be contacting you very shortly.
Ok, so I don't understand why court proceedings are being issued when a request for a default judgement has been requested.
Treat others how you would like to be treated. 🤞0 -
The last message received today.Treat others how you would like to be treated. 🤞0
-
Which solicitor did you receive the first message from? What losses did they issue for?
Sounds like there has been a breakdown in communication as one solicitor should have issued to cover both your losses and your insurers0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards