We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Public sector employee no furlough
Comments
-
Public Sector worker- it would open the floodgates
That's why schools and nurseries are open and available for Public Sector workers
It is very unlikely that they will be allowed to take time off for childcare, not be available for work and receive pay
Granted, there are a few details missing from the picture0 -
The reason public sector organisations can't use furlough is because the taxpayer already funds their staff costs and, unlike private companies, don't have their revenue impacted by more or less customers to deal with. If they had extra duties due to covid, there would be emergency funding available. If they claimed cjrs, they'd be getting funded twice for the same thing.
CJRS is funding for employers, to help them meet costs that they would otherwise have to meet. Because if employers were having to meet those costs without cjrs, we would've seen redundancies on a massive scale.
It was never intended as a benefit for individuals. Their aim was solely to protect the economy.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride6 -
You CAN be furloughed for caring responsibilities - not will or should be.
It is still up to the employer.0 -
Indeed but that would open up a massive flood gate - we would be 30%+ staff short if that was applied at our workplace with no chance/possibility of replacementssheramber said:You CAN be furloughed for caring responsibilities - not will or should be.
It is still up to the employer.
we still haven't been told whether this is because they are not eligible for a school/nursery place as a key worker OR if it's just a disinclination to send said child
OP can you not rearrange shifts etc with a partner or form a childcare bubble ?
Your realistic options are:
1) change your working hours
2) form a bubble for childcare
3) annual leave (share with partner)
4) unpaid leave (share with partner)0 -
You could always consider unpaid parental leave - Unpaid parental leave: Entitlement - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)#2 Saving for Christmas 2024 - £1 a day challenge. £325 of £3660
-
What did you do in March/April when schools were shut?RedLimaA said:
Employee, to help have more hours dedicated to child care and schooling.Grumpy_chap said:Who is making the request for reduced hours? The employee or the employer.
Why is the request being made?
All annual leave has been used to cover reduction in hours but it only covers three weeks.0 -
AIUI, if someone is eligible for furlough, the employer can agree to do this for childcare reasons. If the employee is not eligible for furlough because their job is publicly funded, as in the OP's case, then they cannot be furloughed for any reason.It's not difficult!
'Wander' - to walk or move in a leisurely manner.
'Wonder' - to feel curious.1 -
So OP wants to work less, but get paid the same number of hours, if they're successful, please share.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards