We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
bwlegal - Limitation Act 1980 Query
Comments
-
Of course! Apologies for the crudeness of the picture, I'm on my phone with no access to a scanner at the moment.Coupon-mad said:Can you show us a photo of the letter? Wondering if it threatens legal action.
hxxps://imgur.com/a/EG6Kq0J
(change the hxxps to https and it should work, hopefully...)0 -
Thanks for the heads up. I do understand that this may not be the end of the matter. However, if they do instigate a court action then I assume it should just be a case of responding to the papers accordingly with the relevant information.wannadancewithsomebody said:they can send letters for ever and ever , nothing to stop them , as there is an aledged debt
they can instigate a court case after 6 yrs , the judge may ask why? , all they have to do is answer correctly and case will commence , not all judges are clued up1 -
that letter breaks uk laws and needs reporting
they are STATING that they WILL start legal action , and if payment not recieved by jan 15th they are INSTRUCTED by the PPC
at present BW are just threatening , however the parking co have INSTRUCTED bw to start court action , very very naughty4 -
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street4 -
Let's put it this way ..... they can waste their money sending you letters about their fake claim till the cows come home. FAKE CLAIM ..... of course it is, they added a fake £60ParkingMadd said:
Thanks for the heads up. I do understand that this may not be the end of the matter. However, if they do instigate a court action then I assume it should just be a case of responding to the papers accordingly with the relevant information.wannadancewithsomebody said:they can send letters for ever and ever , nothing to stop them , as there is an aledged debt
they can instigate a court case after 6 yrs , the judge may ask why? , all they have to do is answer correctly and case will commence , not all judges are clued up
The courts already know about BWL and that is why the judges dismiss their cases
READ
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6103933/abuse-of-process-thread-part-2/p1?new=1
There are some judges who fail to understand the parking scam. HOWEVER judges will fully understand theLimitation Act 1980
.... it's the law ....
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/58
Show us how they reply4 -
I believe that she has had letters previously threatening legal action, however it was pretty obvious they were just the usual scare tactics. This is the first from BWL and the only one where it appears PPS have instructed them to issue a claim should a payment not be forthcoming. From searching through other posts it appears as though this is a practice BWL have been keen to employ over the past couple of years.wannadancewithsomebody said:that letter breaks uk laws and needs reporting
they are STATING that they WILL start legal action , and if payment not recieved by jan 15th they are INSTRUCTED by the PPC
at present BW are just threatening , however the parking co have INSTRUCTED bw to start court action , very very naughty
I will happily report this to the SRA and see what they have to say. Other than the date issue discussed and the false £60 charge they have added (on the second page), is there anything else worth highlighting to them?3 -
not worth hightlighting , but IF you get a letter basck from SRA , expect it bto be a coverup , where they say there was a "XX" month delay due to covid , in sending letter out and it should have been done within 6 yrs3
-
Many have complained to the SRA about the fake £60 add-on who have been satisfied that "the client instructed them"ParkingMadd said:
I believe that she has had letters previously threatening legal action, however it was pretty obvious they were just the usual scare tactics. This is the first from BWL and the only one where it appears PPS have instructed them to issue a claim should a payment not be forthcoming. From searching through other posts it appears as though this is a practice BWL have been keen to employ over the past couple of years.wannadancewithsomebody said:that letter breaks uk laws and needs reporting
they are STATING that they WILL start legal action , and if payment not recieved by jan 15th they are INSTRUCTED by the PPC
at present BW are just threatening , however the parking co have INSTRUCTED bw to start court action , very very naughty
I will happily report this to the SRA and see what they have to say. Other than the date issue discussed and the false £60 charge they have added (on the second page), is there anything else worth highlighting to them?
I don't think that anyone has said to the SRA that the reason they say for the £60 is that "the ATA code of practice says they can" ..... this is misleading the court because the code of practice only relates to the PPC and does NOT form a contract for the motorist .... regardless of what PPC signs say.
3 -
Well that changes things slightly.ParkingMadd said:
Of course! Apologies for the crudeness of the picture, I'm on my phone with no access to a scanner at the moment.Coupon-mad said:Can you show us a photo of the letter? Wondering if it threatens legal action.
hxxps://imgur.com/a/EG6Kq0J
(change the hxxps to https and it should work, hopefully...)
I'd still wait, but after Xmas will do as you have till 15 Jan to pay up.
Just hammers the nails home with a response letter dated 2021
2021 - 2014 = 7 leaves little to be argued...
(yeah I know it's only 6 and a bit but there you go)Signature Space for Rent
Don't be confused by the low post count on this account, I've been around many years.....4 -
Definitely report it to the SRA and ONLY quote the fact they are knowingly threatening a claim in the county court, when they know that more than 6 years has already passed. Don't add anything else, don't complain about adding £60, don't muddy the waters.ParkingMadd said:
I believe that she has had letters previously threatening legal action, however it was pretty obvious they were just the usual scare tactics. This is the first from BWL and the only one where it appears PPS have instructed them to issue a claim should a payment not be forthcoming. From searching through other posts it appears as though this is a practice BWL have been keen to employ over the past couple of years.wannadancewithsomebody said:that letter breaks uk laws and needs reporting
they are STATING that they WILL start legal action , and if payment not recieved by jan 15th they are INSTRUCTED by the PPC
at present BW are just threatening , however the parking co have INSTRUCTED bw to start court action , very very naughty
I will happily report this to the SRA and see what they have to say. Other than the date issue discussed and the false £60 charge they have added (on the second page), is there anything else worth highlighting to them?
JUST report the fact they are threatening a court claim when they know the time for that is expired.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD6
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


