We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
My feeling is that some people just like to look for problems and we've become a nation of people who think they need official permission to do anything. When did an Englishman's home stop being his castle?
I agree with your point. But some people are dishonest, so they like to know it complies with regulations.
Regulations and honesty are different things. The attic conversion I described did not comply with building regulations because the ceiling height was just under 2m, but there was no dishonesty involved. It was just presented as it was and was plain for all to see when viewing.
The last time minimum (habitable) ceiling heights was mentioned in the BR’s was pre-November 1986.
My feeling is that some people just like to look for problems and we've become a nation of people who think they need official permission to do anything. When did an Englishman's home stop being his castle?
I agree with your point. But some people are dishonest, so they like to know it complies with regulations.
Regulations and honesty are different things. The attic conversion I described did not comply with building regulations because the ceiling height was just under 2m, but there was no dishonesty involved. It was just presented as it was and was plain for all to see when viewing.
The last time minimum (habitable) ceiling heights was mentioned in the BR’s was pre-November 1986.
Does that mean they've been removed completely or that the 1986 limits still apply?