PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Lack of building reg approval

Options
We're buying a house, pretty much ready to exchange apart from one thing.
Our buyers have done a fair bit of work to the house, and have building regs for most of this, but not for some work done upstairs.  They say that builders said it was not a load bearing wall and therefore not needed.  Our surveyor flagged it we should ask to see that works to the wall met building regs.  They are going back to their builder to check/get it confirmed that it wasn't load bearing.  I'm by no means any sort of building expert but where the wall was removed two posts and a beam have been left, which looked to me like it may have been load bearing too, as surely a clear finish would have been left (its certainly not been left like this for aesthetic as it actually disrupts the use of the room a lot!) The work was carried out about 2 years ago so I wouldn't be surprised if builder can't even remember the property now.
What are our options now?  I assume 1) we pay for a builder to go in and check if it was load bearing or now - and then can building regs be got retrospectively? 2) we continue with purchase without this info and take the risk ourselves?
is there any other option?  Such as an indemnity policy or something?  and if so do these take a long time to arrange?

Comments

  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    So you'd be happy to sit under an unsupported load-bearing wall, as long as you have an indemnity policy?
    Why can your surveyor not establish if the wall is load-bearing or not? It should be perfectly obvious. 
    The builder is not going to tell you anything that would show him to be incompetent if he did not support the wall if needed.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • FreeBear
    FreeBear Posts: 18,168 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    sarah69696pink said:  They are going back to their builder to check/get it confirmed that it wasn't load bearing.
    Never, ever accept the opinion of a builder - You need to consult a structural engineer. Only he/she can give you a qualified opinion as to whether the wall is load bearing or not and advise on suitable support.
    In many buildings, especially modern ones, what may appear to be a non-load bearing stud wall could in fact be supporting the floor or roof above.
    Her courage will change the world.

    Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.
  • Petriix
    Petriix Posts: 2,296 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If it hasn't fallen down in two years then it's unlikely to suddenly do so now. I'm not sure what risk you think there is but I wouldn't let the lack of regs put you off buying a house you otherwise like.
  • Petriix said:
    If it hasn't fallen down in two years then it's unlikely to suddenly do so now. I'm not sure what risk you think there is but I wouldn't let the lack of regs put you off buying a house you otherwise like.
    This is not the advice I'd be following.

    If it is a load bearing wall it needs to be supported correctly. If you can;t establish this yourself, get a proper report done. 
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A surveyor should be perfectly capable of telling you whether it's a load-bearing wall or not. If it is, then a structural engineer would be needed to establish whether the support used is adequate, and that means accessing the RSJ, if it's not visible.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • Thanks all - I did pay for a full structural building survey but it doesn't say either way if that wall is load bearing.  It simply advises my legal advisors to ensure they confirm whether the removal of the wall has been granted statutory approval and that completion certificates are available as appropriate.
    I will go back to the surveyor and ask for more info.
  • I'd go for a specialist structural engineer to do a report on it.
    Yes the survey was 'full structural' but that doesn't mean they are an expert in everything, they can spot areas where a specialist will need to look further.
    Speak to the surveyor and see if he can recommend a local engineer.
  • Thanks pretamang 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.