We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

S&S ISA transfer - share class not supported

Hi all, Im a novice investor and would appreciate some advice.
Im currently using Interactive Investor as the platform for a S&S ISA with several funds, and an old Invesco Global Equity fund provided by Invesco themselves.  Because of the management fees (1.67% on that fund)  I have tried to transfer the Invesco fund over to II but the share class isn't supported.
II can't transfer the fund as-is because that class is not supported, and Invesco can't convert to the one they do support as its not available to retail.  My only options appear to be; Leave as is or Sell the shares and transfer the cash over to retain the ISA wrapper.  The fund hasn't done too well in recent years so a little hesitant about selling.
Any thoughts or advice as to what to do welcome!  Thanks


Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,621 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 6 November 2020 at 10:19PM
    Is your rationale that, because of it's recent underperformance, this fund is set to perform better than other funds in its sector in the next few years and catch them up? Seems more likely an underperforming fund will continue to underperform, especially one with relatively high charges.
  • HiZ
    HiZ Posts: 16 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    masonic said:
    Is your rationale that, because of it's recent underperformance, this fund is set to perform better than other funds in its sector in the next few years and catch them up? Seems more likely an underperforming fund will continue to underperform, especially one with relatively high charges.
    OK, fair point.  My rationale is that Im in this for the long term so hopefully it would recover.  However, looking at the trend its been underperforming the benchmark for a couple of years.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,621 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I'd be surprised if you couldn't find a similar fund over at II, perhaps one with lower charges and better prospects.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    HiZ said:
    OK, fair point.  My rationale is that Im in this for the long term so hopefully it would recover.  However, looking at the trend its been underperforming the benchmark for a couple of years.
    Although it's commendable that you see investing as a long term activity are there any particular reasons you want to be in this fund when you could just get an index tracker at 10% of the price? Why do you think the performance would improve to make faster gains than a tracker? Many active funds suffer a similar slow performance death and never really get up pace again. It's probably a good thing that II won't transfer it as a trigger for you to review it - would you put new money in it today?
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    masonic said:
    I'd be surprised if you couldn't find a similar fund over at II, perhaps one with lower charges and better prospects.
    I am not an expert on how the II user interface works but filtering on 'actively managed', 'expensive' and 'average to poor performance' might give a good selection of similar funds to put misplaced faith in.
  • HiZ
    HiZ Posts: 16 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Alexland said:
    masonic said:
    I'd be surprised if you couldn't find a similar fund over at II, perhaps one with lower charges and better prospects.
    I am not an expert on how the II user interface works but filtering on 'actively managed', 'expensive' and 'average to poor performance' might give a good selection of similar funds to put misplaced faith in.
    Ok, point taken!
    Ive had the fund for 20 years and haven’t contributed to if for the last 5 or so. I’ll do some research and look to transfer the cash over and put it to better use such as adding to my existing Vanguard Lifestrategy, F&C IT etc.

    It’s probably a separate thread itself but is now a good time to feed my low cost UK tracker.  Obviously these have taken a big hit since March.
  • Alexland
    Alexland Posts: 10,183 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 November 2020 at 11:21AM
    HiZ said:
    It’s probably a separate thread itself but is now a good time to feed my low cost UK tracker.  Obviously these have taken a big hit since March.
    If you have conviction that UK listed companies are undervalued and will provide a good source of capital growth and income then sure. Or if you hold a few geographic trackers and need to rebalance to a target asset allocation then yes again.
    Otherwise just hold an All World or Global All Cap tracker and let the market work it out reasonably efficiently.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.