We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Default for £60 CC Overspend without warning
Options

Marleyuk
Posts: 12 Forumite

Hi,
My wife received a letter today confirming a notice (default charge) was being applied to her account because she made a transaction that put her credit card £60 over her credit limit.
The balance of the card is paid in full every month, no notifications had been received suggesting she was approaching the limit, and outside of this letter, nothing to confirm she had gone over the limit.
She called Virgin to offer to pay the balance off early this month and request the notice be removed but the staff member abruptly refused and said there was nothing that could be done.
A default feels like an extreme reaction to a £60 overspend given if she had been aware, she would have resolved it immediately.
Outside of a complaint, is there anything else she can do to remove?
My wife received a letter today confirming a notice (default charge) was being applied to her account because she made a transaction that put her credit card £60 over her credit limit.
The balance of the card is paid in full every month, no notifications had been received suggesting she was approaching the limit, and outside of this letter, nothing to confirm she had gone over the limit.
She called Virgin to offer to pay the balance off early this month and request the notice be removed but the staff member abruptly refused and said there was nothing that could be done.
A default feels like an extreme reaction to a £60 overspend given if she had been aware, she would have resolved it immediately.
Outside of a complaint, is there anything else she can do to remove?
0
Comments
-
It isnt a "default".0
-
bradders1983 said:It isnt a "default".This is the letter they sent. The person at Virgin suggested it would appear on her credit file?0
-
Did you bring the balance within the limit as soon as you received the letter, despite what they said?
If so I would try again and ask nicely and point out that it was the first time and you thought they would have text you, but you'll be more careful in the future.
Some banks are switching over to using alerts in mobile apps instead of texts, if you already have the mobile app installed then you could also say that you thought that would have warned you.
If not then you could ask if there was anything you could do to avoid going over your limit and if they say to install the app, you could point out that if you'd been made aware that you should install the app then you wouldn't have been charged.
0 -
Thanks for your response.
The letter was only received today and she paid it off on the phone whilst asking the advisor if it could be removed.
I’ve told her to call back and hope someone more helpful answers the phone.0 -
It is correct, she has gone over the limit on the card, she is contractually obliged to stay below that limit, it is your wife's job to monitor her own spending. They will not remove the data from your wife's credit record as it is correct, credit records also show available credit and utilisation, so if she was using more than her available credit that is obvious she has gone over the limit even if the flag was removed.
They may agree to waive the charge, but they will not change the data they report to the CRAs. They most important thing is to make sure that it does not happen again, one instance is not really an issue unless it happens in the middle of a mortgage application, one instance with no repeat behaviour will have little to no impact after several months.2 -
Marleyuk said:This is the letter they sent. The person at Virgin suggested it would appear on her credit file?
Default In Finance, default is failure to meet the legal obligations of a loan
1 -
MattMattMattUK said:It is correct, she has gone over the limit on the card, she is contractually obliged to stay below that limit, it is your wife's job to monitor her own spending. They will not remove the data from your wife's credit record as it is correct, credit records also show available credit and utilisation, so if she was using more than her available credit that is obvious she has gone over the limit even if the flag was removed.
They may agree to waive the charge, but they will not change the data they report to the CRAs. They most important thing is to make sure that it does not happen again, one instance is not really an issue unless it happens in the middle of a mortgage application, on instance with no repeat behaviour will have no impact after several months.
Why would they process the payment if it was going over her available limit?0 -
Marleyuk said:It has happened in the middle of a mortgage application.
Some do, some do not, there may have been payments in processing which did not all go through until afterwards which brought the overall total above the limit, they may have a clause that they will process a transaction up to £X / X% over the limit, but apply a fee etc. just as banks will often let people go into an unauthorised overdraft rather than blocking the transaction.Marleyuk said:Why would they process the payment if it was going over her available limit?
Unfortunately it is down to the individual not to exceed the agreed line of credit, lenders may offer services (text messages, app alerts etc.) to assist with this, but the legal and contractual obligation is with the individual.5 -
OP, i know its human nature to protect your wife but she has to shoulder some of the blame here, surely she knows the rough balance of her cards and the limits on them?2
-
bradders1983 said:OP, i know its human nature to protect your wife but she has to shoulder some of the blame here, surely she knows the rough balance of her cards and the limits on them?It’s an exceptionally easy oversight to have made, with the consequences significantly outweighing the crime.
With no notification or grace period, the banks duty of care to their customer is questionable.
I guess we’ll see how the FOS perceives it.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards