We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mot charged to much. AA
Comments
-
Sort of yes, but also sort of no. How much do DVSA charge for the slots? That'll set the bar as to how profitable £35 might be.AdrianC said:
DVSA charge garages for test slots - but tests are zero vat, if that's what you mean.Were_Doomed said:
The government don't take any cut from the test fee? (A quick search doesn't throw up any relevant results to this question). If not then I accept that it's a purely commercial decision by the provider, albeit with a mandated maximum charge.AdrianC said:
The test fee is a maximum of £55, 0% VAT. Any garage is free to charge less if they wish.Were_Doomed said:One does wonder how they can make a profit though, given that the test fee itself is >£35.
0 -
Were_Doomed said:
£205 per hundred in 2014, so about two quid per slot.
Sort of yes, but also sort of no. How much do DVSA charge for the slots? That'll set the bar as to how profitable £35 might be.AdrianC said:DVSA charge garages for test slots - but tests are zero vat, if that's what you mean.
https://mattersoftesting.blog.gov.uk/using-direct-debit-to-make-slot-payments/
A test should take about 45min, all in. So a bit under £45/hr.
But, of course, that doesn't factor in the AA's commission or fees, and the costs of collection and drop-off...1 -
The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands onIt used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why0
-
The rest is for admin/profit and as already mentioned the price may not be available to you going direct. Next time, just go direct.Sunseteyes said:Hi, I went through the AA To get my mot, they have taken over £600.00 to pass my car. When I went to pick my car up. I was told the garage quoted the AA £280.00!. Why can they charge twice the garage price and can I do anything about it?0 -
It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.dogshome said:The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands onIt used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.
As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...0 -
Maybe by finding £280 worth of work that needs doing and charging £600 for it.Were_Doomed said:Worked for me today too. Same result ... £35 for the MOT only (including collection/delivery) and specified the choice of test centres.
One does wonder how they can make a profit though, given that the test fee itself is >£35.0 -
AdrianC said:
It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.dogshome said:The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands onIt used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.
As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...It may not have a "For sale" sign up, but it has been reported to be in talks with three potential buyers. The P & L may be healthy, but the need to sell is driven by debts of £2.65 million.
0 -
£2.65bn - stated in that article as down from £3bn in 2014 at flotation...Car_54 said:AdrianC said:
It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.dogshome said:The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands onIt used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.
As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...It may not have a "For sale" sign up, but it has been reported to be in talks with three potential buyers. The P & L may be healthy, but the need to sell is driven by debts of £2.65 million.
0 -
I thought that must be a typo so I checked the linked article ... debts of 2.65 billion! (Debts of 2.65 million on revenue of 995 million is a pittance).Car_54 said:AdrianC said:
It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.dogshome said:The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands onIt used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.
As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...It may not have a "For sale" sign up, but it has been reported to be in talks with three potential buyers. The P & L may be healthy, but the need to sell is driven by debts of £2.65 million.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
