We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mot charged to much. AA

Options
13»

Comments

  • AdrianC said:
    AdrianC said:
    One does wonder how they can make a profit though, given that the test fee itself is >£35.
    The test fee is a maximum of £55, 0% VAT. Any garage is free to charge less if they wish.
    The government don't take any cut from the test fee? (A quick search doesn't throw up any relevant results to this question). If not then I accept that it's a purely commercial decision by the provider, albeit with a mandated maximum charge.
    DVSA charge garages for test slots - but tests are zero vat, if that's what you mean.
    Sort of yes, but also sort of no. How much do DVSA charge for the slots? That'll set the bar as to how profitable £35 might be. :)
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Were_Doomed said:
    AdrianC said:
    DVSA charge garages for test slots - but tests are zero vat, if that's what you mean.
    Sort of yes, but also sort of no. How much do DVSA charge for the slots? That'll set the bar as to how profitable £35 might be. :)
    £205 per hundred in 2014, so about two quid per slot.
    https://mattersoftesting.blog.gov.uk/using-direct-debit-to-make-slot-payments/

    A test should take about 45min, all in. So a bit under £45/hr.

    But, of course, that doesn't factor in the AA's commission or fees, and the costs of collection and drop-off...
  • dogshome
    dogshome Posts: 3,878 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 October 2020 at 5:58PM
    The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands on
    It used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)
    Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.

    It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
  • lopsyfa
    lopsyfa Posts: 474 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi, I went through the AA To get my mot, they have taken over £600.00 to pass my car. When I went to pick my car up. I was told  the garage quoted the AA £280.00!.  Why can they charge twice the garage price and can I do anything about it? 
    The rest is for admin/profit and as already mentioned the price may not be available to  you going direct. Next time, just go direct.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    dogshome said:
    The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands on
    It used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)
    Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.

    It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
    It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.

    While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.

    As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...
  • Worked for me today too. Same result ... £35 for the MOT only (including collection/delivery) and specified the choice of test centres.

    One does wonder how they can make a profit though, given that the test fee itself is >£35.
    Maybe by finding £280 worth of work that needs doing and charging £600 for it.
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,838 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    AdrianC said:
    dogshome said:
    The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands on
    It used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)
    Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.

    It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
    It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.

    While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.

    As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...
    It may not have a "For sale" sign up, but it has been reported to be in talks with three potential buyers. The P & L may be healthy, but the need to sell is driven by debts of £2.65 million.

  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Car_54 said:
    AdrianC said:
    dogshome said:
    The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands on
    It used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)
    Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.

    It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
    It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.

    While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.

    As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...
    It may not have a "For sale" sign up, but it has been reported to be in talks with three potential buyers. The P & L may be healthy, but the need to sell is driven by debts of £2.65 million.
    £2.65bn - stated in that article as down from £3bn in 2014 at flotation...
  • Car_54 said:
    AdrianC said:
    dogshome said:
    The AA is sinking under a mountain of debt, grasping every penny it can get.it's hands on
    It used to be a Mutual owned by it's customers, (My wife was a customer when it became a company and got a worthwhile pay-out)
    Since then it has had at least 4 owners to my count, each of which used borrowings for the Buy-out price and then loaded the debt onto the AA.

    It's been up for sale for about 3 months with no takers - I wonder why
    It isn't "up for sale" any more than any other public limited company - it is trading on the LSE, and has been since 2014.

    While it was a private limited company, between 1999 and 2014, it had two owners - Centrica until 2007, then jointly between two venture capital companies (CVC and Permira), who merged it with Saga as Acromas Holdings. They were demerged when they were both listed.

    As for "sinking" - £257m operating profit in FY19-20, up 17% on FY18-19, off revenue of £995m, up 2%, EBITDA of £350m, +3%, doesn't look horrible to me...
    It may not have a "For sale" sign up, but it has been reported to be in talks with three potential buyers. The P & L may be healthy, but the need to sell is driven by debts of £2.65 million.

    I thought that must be a typo so I checked the linked article ... debts of 2.65 billion! (Debts of 2.65 million on revenue of 995 million is a pittance).
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.