Am I legally allowed to keep “unsolicited” goods

Hi all I placed an online order with a large retail chain for 3 items. The order turned up and I received 19 of the same. Can the company make me give them back? Or am I legally allowed to keep them under the unsolicited goods act? 
Thank you 😊 
«1

Replies

  • noitsnotmenoitsnotme Forumite
    611 Posts
    500 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    If they only sent you 1 of the 3 you items you paid for would you be happy to accept that?
  • MalMonroeMalMonroe Forumite
    5.4K Posts
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    It's obviously a mistake. Why not just contact the seller, tell them what's happened and ask them to collect the surplus items. 
    Please note - taken from the Forum Rules and amended for my own personal use (with thanks) : It is up to you to investigate, check, double-check and check yet again before you make any decisions or take any action based on any information you glean from any of my posts. Although I do carry out careful research before posting and never intend to mislead or supply out-of-date or incorrect information, please do not rely 100% on what you are reading. Verify everything in order to protect yourself as you are responsible for any action you consequently take.
  • naedangernaedanger Forumite
    3.1K Posts
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    mr58wry said:
    Hi all I placed an online order with a large retail chain for 3 items. The order turned up and I received 19 of the same. Can the company make me give them back? Or am I legally allowed to keep them under the unsolicited goods act? 
    Thank you 😊 
    No. Goods sent by mistake don't qualify as "unsolicited goods" under legislation.
    You can only keep hold of an item if it is addressed to you, there has been no previous contact with the company, and it arrives out of the blue. This is a genuine unsolicited item and is usually used as a marketing tactic, explains Citizens Advice.
    Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37048351
  • edited 25 October 2020 at 8:48AM
    MoneySeeker1MoneySeeker1 Forumite
    1.2K Posts
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper First Anniversary
    Forumite
    edited 25 October 2020 at 8:48AM
    In that situation at the moment.

    Been sent a pair of footwear I didn't order - by Amazon. Think it's probably a mix-up of "Oh that's why I never got my own footwear I ordered/had to have a refund/order a different pair instead" - and maybe some other person wondered why they got my shoes. I'm certainly wondering why I got their shoes - addressed to me by my name.

    I just know that to get them back to Amazon seller - I'd be put through hassle contacting Amazon/Amazon would tell me they'd send me a label to print off/I'd tell them that's not possible (because I don't have a printer - as I indeed don't).....and then we'd go round and round in circles ad infinitum, as I kept asking them for a realistic way to get those shoes back to them (ie that didn't involve me having that non-existent printer or me having to wait to get reimbursed postage money I'd spent for their sake).

    There is a law allowing people to keep unsolicited goods after 3 months has expired.

    So I'm rather thinking "Keep them for 3 months and then at 3 months 1 day - give them to charity" as the quickest/easiest way to resolve the situation - without them causing me all sorts of hassle.

    Many years ago a prankster had me sent unsolicited goods - and I found that "3 months law" thing and it was all easier back in that day and I was able to tell the firm the order wasn't really from me, but they never did arrange to collect their goods. So, at 3 months 1 day I gave them to charity.
  • noitsnotmenoitsnotme Forumite
    611 Posts
    500 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    What “3 month law thing”?  Can you link to a source of said “thing”?!
  • MoneySeeker1MoneySeeker1 Forumite
    1.2K Posts
    1,000 Posts Name Dropper First Anniversary
    Forumite
    What “3 month law thing”?  Can you link to a source of said “thing”?!
    I'd have to google to try and find it - so I doubt my Google search would be any quicker than yours would be.

    Should we have a Google race? #joke
  • elsienelsien Forumite
    29.9K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    Aside from the excuses about why you won’t send the shoes back, you are not in the same situation as the OP as the OP did place an order (although for a different amount)  so they are not unsolicited under the meaning of the act. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • naedangernaedanger Forumite
    3.1K Posts
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    What “3 month law thing”?  Can you link to a source of said “thing”?!
    I'd have to google to try and find it - so I doubt my Google search would be any quicker than yours would be.

    Should we have a Google race? #joke
    I think you were being asked because noitsnotme suspects (or knows) what you have said is wrong. By asking you to source your beliefs they were possibly hoping you would realise this for yourself.

    I too think you are wrong and cannot find anything authoritative to support your view. I have found quite authoritative sources that suggest you are wrong e.g. see the link from the bbc above. 
  • They aren’t unsolicited- they are a mistake/error
    Unsolicited would only apply if you received items having had zero contact or expectation to receive ANY item from someone
  • edited 25 October 2020 at 10:04AM
    noitsnotmenoitsnotme Forumite
    611 Posts
    500 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Forumite
    edited 25 October 2020 at 10:04AM
    What “3 month law thing”?  Can you link to a source of said “thing”?!
    I'd have to google to try and find it - so I doubt my Google search would be any quicker than yours would be.

    Should we have a Google race? #joke
    I’m not wasting my time looking for something that I don’t believe exists.  I would be happy to be proved wrong though.

    In theory, the statute of limitations is likely to give Amazon 6 years to try and claim back anything they feel you owe them, which presumably would be any difference between the amount you paid for the shoes you ordered and value of the shoes they actually sent you (assuming the pair you received were higher value than the ones ordered).  Knowing Amazon they’re more likely to charge you the difference which you’d have to fight and/or just close your account.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Did you know there's an MSE app?

It's free & available on iOS & Android

MSE App

Regifting: good idea or not?

Add your two cents to the discussion

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools