We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Removed text
Options

AskAsk
Posts: 3,048 Forumite

Removed text
0
Comments
-
Haven't the solicitors discussed this? I'd normally expect there to be a retention until your liability is known.0
-
Your Sol (in fact on both sides) will take a retainer to cover costs once the end of year statement is produced. So it can take up to 12 months before you get some/part/none of your cash back.0
-
Is £500 likely to be enough to cover a full year's service charge? If so, the solicitors might have taken account of the service charge in arrears.
Alternatively, the solicitors might be making an estimated apportionment now (maybe based on last year's bill), and retaining £500 for any final adjustments.0 -
It is standard practice for a retainer to be held by solicitors so that when the final bill is submitted, the correct amount can be calculated for the seller's period of ownership. This is then paid out of the retenation, and any balance pased to the seller.It is for the buyer (his solicitor) to ensure that a suficient retention is held to cover this, since he is the one who will end up being charged for the full year, but if you wish to assist in this then advise your solicitor to advise the buyer's solicitorwhat th normal annual charge is, and hence what your share is likely to be.1
-
The way most service charges are levied is on the current leaseholder only - the new leaseholder "takes over" the account for the property, which is why apportionments and retentions are done by your solicitors on sale/purchase. Managing agents do not normally get involved in chasing former owners for monies owed from final service charges - it is much easier for them to bill the new owner. Consequently a new owner needs to be happy that the outgoing owner has left enough money with his solicitor, as a retention, to cover all bills. Any money over and above the sum needed is returned to the vendor.
Having said that, if "the council" are the people sending out the service charge bills, you really need to check what their policy is on this.1 -
AskAsk said:are you saying that the council would send the whole bill to the buyer even though he didn't own the property for the whole period? this is what my original question was, whether the council would split the bill and bill both of us, or do they not have the right any more to bill me, as i would no longer be a leaseholder at the time they get round to billing?
Yes - the whole bill will be sent to the buyer. And if the buyer doesn't pay the whole amount, the council will take action against the buyer.
1 -
Sounds like they buyers Solicitor has cocked up and not asked for enough of a retention.... Your gain the buyers loss, I wouldn’t lose any sleep over it, not your problem, between the buyer and his incompetent solicitor.1
-
AskAsk said:are you sure we can refuse to pay any excess demand for the shortage?
You have a contract with the buyer - you need to read that contract to see what it says happens if there's a shortfall in the service charge (or ask your solicitor what your contract says).
If you're correct about the buyer's solicitor being a bit 'dopey', your solicitor might have sneakily put in terms which are more favourable to you than to the buyer.
0 -
AskAsk said:
the contract does not refer to service charge, which was why the rider was added to it for the retention of the service charge. the rider only refers to excess charge for the period up to 31.03.2021 when final amounts are known, as the bills are based on an estimate.
So that answers your question. If the contract doesn't say you have to pay any excess service charge above £500 - then you don't have to pay any excess service charge above £500.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards