PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying a home with extensive historic modifications but no building regs approval

Options
Hi All, 
First time buyer, with an offer accepted on a 3 bed terrace (+ loft conversion) in central Brighton for £450k. We love the property but it has had extensive historic modifications, none of which have building regs. They include: a lower-ground floor kitchen and office extension; a ground floor bathroom; a shower with the door opening directly onto the hallway; the removal of a wall in the ground floor reception rooms to create a single room; and a loft conversion with a steep spiral staircase (but which is not included as a habitable room, but a storage space). 

Most of these works have been carried out over 15 years ago (we've seen floorplans / pictures from the previous sale on rightmove) but none have building regs approval. Some clearly wouldn't meet contemporary building regs e.g. the shower. We have had a homebuyers survey (but not a structural survey) which has not highlighted any major issues with the work that has been done, and the house looks immaculate. 

As it is our first purchase we are nervous - not about the risk of enforcement given the time elapsed, but whether this will be an issue for future buyers which will impact resale. We are also worried about our ability to rent the property out, as we are likely to be out of the country for periods. 

My questions:
-are we right to be worried about the impact on value / future sales or is this routine?
-will this impact our ability to rent the property out through reputable estate agents? 
-would a structural survey that says 'the work is structurally sound' be of value to future sellers - would this effectively resolve the issue? how useful will indemnity be?
-should we reduce our offer to factor these issues in? 

Thanks so much in advance! 

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 20 October 2020 at 9:09PM
    are we right to be worried about the impact on value / future sales or is this routine?
    -will this impact our ability to rent the property out through reputable estate agents? 
    -would a structural survey that says 'the work is structurally sound' be of value to future sellers - would this effectively resolve the issue? how useful will indemnity be?
    -should we reduce our offer to factor these issues in? 
    If all the works are out of time for enforcement then indemnity insurance is pointless. So you deal with the alterations on their merits (e.g. would a steep spiral staircase put you, or other people, off). I don't see it mattering for letting purposes.
    Buyers will probably ask the same questions as you are, but by then the works will be even more historic than they are now. You can show them your structural survey if you want, though the fact that there are no obvious problems 15+ years later is evidence enough in itself. Buyers can't rely on your structural survey though (i.e. sue your surveyor if they got things wrong).
  • pbhb
    pbhb Posts: 124 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts
    I have just put an offer in on a property with a similar situation. Loft conversion with no building regs certificate. My concern was on the resale, but if I worried about everything that could put someone off a property, I would never buy a thing. If you are happy to proceed, there will be others who would also be happy to move forward with it too:

    I spoke to someone today who used to work in conveyancing and said this is a common problem. People get work done and received an A4 paper size certificate which is easily lost!
  • Thanks both. The consensus I’m hearing is that, given the works were carried out 15+ years ago, and there are no obvious issues with them, then we shouldn’t be too concerned. A structural survey would nonetheless be a good idea.

    are there any other questions we should be asking of the vendors / things we should be looking out for to avoid getting stung here? 

    Thanks!
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    A structural survey would nonetheless be a good idea.
    I think it would be of limited value if the "normal" surveyor hasn't spotted any problems to investigate further. If they want to verify e.g. that there has been a steel beam installed where they might hope one would have been, they probably can't do that without getting permission to make holes in the plasterboard or whatever is concealing it.
  • Mickey666
    Mickey666 Posts: 2,834 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    There are plenty of 'period properties' that were built before building regulations and structural analysis even existed.  I have one that's over 450 years old and it has many 'features' that would not comply with modern building regs.  The fact that it is still standing and is in sound structural condition is proof enough that it requires no building regs certificate.  That's not to say that all old properties were better built than modern ones, more that the poorly built once have all fallen down so only the well-built ones survive.

    Unfortunately, society has 'advanced' so much nowadays that almost everything we do or have done needs to have an associated piece of paper certifying that it has been done properly (or at least to some arbitrary standard).  For a supposedly free society, we are bound up with an awful lot of laws and regulations and there is less and less we can do for ourselves without some form of official permission.  This, together with an ever-more litigious society that is always looking for someone to blame when something goes wrong (because it's never OUR fault is it?), means that these pieces of paper are increasingly vital to our daily lives.

    The plain fact is that the alterations described by the OP were done 15+ years ago and there have been no problems arising from them.  After all this time, the chances of something arising are small  to non-existent.  Yet here we are worrying about a piece of paper.  Still, the regulatory cat is out of the bag now and is never going back so we'd better all get used to this sort of thing, and more.  This forum is proof of it.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 256.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.