We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Old cash ISA can be split? Limits?
Comments
-
The 'free to hold ITs at HL' is only if you're holding them in an 'unwrapped' general investment account (they call it a 'fund and share' account); if you want to hold in an ISA you have a percentage basis but capped at a reasonably low amount. The exception would just be in some cases where a fund manager is no longer offering their own ISAs direct and encourages people to move to HL's service and HL will offer a deal on the fees (usually temporarily) to ensure people aren't discouraged from moving across and trying their service.ANGLICANPAT said:Eco-Miser, havent really done my research thoroughly yet to take on board precise charges , ( Id just presumed HL was free to hold IT's for eg although maybe its only for BG transfers) and I quite like their customer service, but if your eg. is the case , then yes , Id probably be better with just the one . Will be doing more homework. Thanks all.
If you are already doing some ISA investment on a different platform which wouldn't have much of an incremental cost for holding another couple of ITs, there's no point buying HL's service to start paying them a fee for holding the ITs, even if it's a relatively nominal £45 a year.
The counterpoint is that if you expect to need access to the value at short notice it can be useful to have a portion of your money with an alternate provider just in case there is a temporary problem at ISA Manager A, it may be handy to still be able to access the assets at ISA Manager B, as it's unlikely they would both suffer major disaster or fraud at the same time. If you already have lots of ready cash or other liquid assets outside the S&S ISA then probably no need to pay the extra £45 a year for that 'insurance'.1 -
That is what I would avoid. Do one at a time because you won't actually know what the final balance on your cash ISA will be until the existing provider transfers it. The addition of even a few £ interest could screw the whole thing up. My advice would be (if cash ISA provider allows xfer out of part) to get one S&S ISA provider to transfer a round figure of approx half, if you wish. Then when that's arrived, ask 2nd provider to transfer balance.ANGLICANPAT said:....................
badger 09 - I was thinking that it would be filling a form to authorize each new platform to request transfer of half the BS maturity cash to them and then when each had its cash, straight away I'd buy two new funds (on each platform) with it . That doesnt sound like a good idea in the light of what youve said? Are you suggesting it would leave less scope for error , to leave half the maturity cash in an instant ISA with the BS and deal with each platform one at a time ? (Or maybe was it deal with both platforms at a time , but only buy one fund at a time , the second one once first properly in place and correct?)1 -
Bowlhead thanks . Badger point taken thanks . In the light of various advice above , Im going to stick to the one platform , so hopefully things will be straightforward ..0
-
Apologies for resurrecting this again , but I'd like to clarify a point that has just occurred to me please . Ive opened my Iweb account now , and transfers in from back years are in hand , spread out a bit as suggested . Doing just two funds . mainly HSBC global , and probably bit of Impax for the other one as a little extra 'green' . Anyway I wondered if s/s isa are the same as cash ones in as much as they can lapse if you miss paying into them one year ? If I want to pay the whole £20k allowance into HSBC next year , but the following year choose to divide further £20k between the two funds. Would I have to do extra paperwork or pay any charge before being able to add to Impax again?0
-
Even if you failed to pay any money into a S&S isa during one tax year, it would still be 'active' in that the following tax year you can add any amount up to the limit allowed, whether in existing funds you hold, or new ones you might wish to invest in. You'd only be paying the trading fee for the deposits, ie with iweb, £5 per trade to buy into a fund & no paperwork involved as you already have an account with them.The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.
I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.1 -
No you just pay the money in, buy £10k of the HSBC fund and £10k of Impax (or however much of each fund you want). Once the money is in the ISA you can do what you want - buy funds, sell funds, leave it as cash etc.ANGLICANPAT said:Apologies for resurrecting this again , but I'd like to clarify a point that has just occurred to me please . Ive opened my Iweb account now , and transfers in from back years are in hand , spread out a bit as suggested . Doing just two funds . mainly HSBC global , and probably bit of Impax for the other one as a little extra 'green' . Anyway I wondered if s/s isa are the same as cash ones in as much as they can lapse if you miss paying into them one year ? You would miss that year's £20k allowance if you didn't add any money in but whatever's in there would just stay there, don't know what you mean by lapse.
If I want to pay the whole £20k allowance into HSBC next year , but the following year choose to divide further £20k between the two funds. Would I have to do extra paperwork or pay any charge before being able to add to Impax again?
1 -
Brilliant cattie thank you. That should make life simpler .0
-
Another Saver . ---- I had this quote from Nat West in mind and wasnt sure if s/s the same. " If you haven't deposited money into your ISA for a full tax year, and you want to pay into it again, you will need to reactivate your account." Some places refer to it as being lapsed it would seem . Ive just realized now it wouldnt affect my funds , because they are both in the same ISA wrapper which I keep forgetting , so whichever I funded wouldn't matter . (Im a bit slow realizing these things lol ! ) It would seem from answers given too , that with s/s funds it wouldnt matter anyway even if I didnt fund either in a tax year , I could still fund the following year without having to re-activate or re-do anything .
0 -
I haven't heard of having to do this with S&S ISAs. With iWeb you open the account, stick your £20k in, buy whatever funds/ETFs/stocks etc. you want and that's it. No "reactivating", you just leave it and let it (hopefully) grow, that sounds like something you might have used to have to do with the more old fashioned ISA providers but I haven't heard of it. Your iWeb account will just sit there waiting for you.ANGLICANPAT said:Another Saver . ---- I had this quote from Nat West in mind and wasnt sure if s/s the same. " If you haven't deposited money into your ISA for a full tax year, and you want to pay into it again, you will need to reactivate your account." Some places refer to it as being lapsed it would seem . Ive just realized now it wouldnt affect my funds , because they are both in the same ISA wrapper which I keep forgetting , so whichever I funded wouldn't matter . (Im a bit slow realizing these things lol ! ) It would seem from answers given too , that with s/s funds it wouldnt matter anyway even if I didnt fund either in a tax year , I could still fund the following year without having to re-activate or re-do anything .1 -
From my experience (tens of isa accounts over all 3 types) the vast majority, if not all, do require an account to be reactivated if you want to pay new subscriptions in and you didn't pay any in in the previous tax year. It's no hassle though, you just tick a box and click a button to confirm that you wish to make new subscriptions in the current tax year. You're really just confirming that you understand that you can't make new subscriptions to more than 1 ISA of the same type in a tax year.Another_Saver said:
I haven't heard of having to do this with S&S ISAs. With iWeb you open the account, stick your £20k in, buy whatever funds/ETFs/stocks etc. you want and that's it. No "reactivating", you just leave it and let it (hopefully) grow, that sounds like something you might have used to have to do with the more old fashioned ISA providers but I haven't heard of it. Your iWeb account will just sit there waiting for you.ANGLICANPAT said:Another Saver . ---- I had this quote from Nat West in mind and wasnt sure if s/s the same. " If you haven't deposited money into your ISA for a full tax year, and you want to pay into it again, you will need to reactivate your account." Some places refer to it as being lapsed it would seem . Ive just realized now it wouldnt affect my funds , because they are both in the same ISA wrapper which I keep forgetting , so whichever I funded wouldn't matter . (Im a bit slow realizing these things lol ! ) It would seem from answers given too , that with s/s funds it wouldnt matter anyway even if I didnt fund either in a tax year , I could still fund the following year without having to re-activate or re-do anything .2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards