We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Parking charge for parking on land not owned by the company

minty777 · 2020-10-13 08:15:01

The £60-rising-to-£100 penalties were issued by Parking Eye on behalf of Salford-based Welcome Estates. But many of those hit with a fine say they were parked on the gravel area near the entrance to the car park - which Welcome Estates does not own. It does own the Tarmacked area next to it. But the position of the camera…

Comments

fisherjim Posts: 7,111 Forumite

22 October 2020 at 9:43AM edited 22 October 2020 at 9:43AM

I thought Steve Clark's performance was just as bad as all the other spokespersons that the BPA put on TV, and to say that Parking Eye had "recalibrated their systems" just meant; I will say something to fob the viewers off as I really know ANPR should not be used at this site.
In fact surely the real answer here is that the ANPR should be turned off all together. If the entrance to the car park and the other area is shared it (as always) is not fit for purpose

3