We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Yours clothing - stolen parcel - my rights?
Comments
-
Exactly, I've messaged Yours several times now and they refused to answer, saying it's a police matter and not their problem any more. I don't know what else to do as I quoted my rights at them and they ignored me.Sandtree said:
Why chargeback rather than speaking to Yours?wolfbane9 said:
Thanks. What's next steps - chargeback?Were_Doomed said:Goods remain at the sender's liability until they are received by the addressee / at the address. Leaving with a neighbour - especially when expressly not agreed to - does not absolve the sender of that liability.
As already explained, it remains their liability until its either in your hands or left where you instruct them to and so its for them to put right. You can do a chargeback but then have the uncertainty for an age afterwards that the retailer may dispute it and the money be taken back again.0 -
But surely by that logic they can deliver to wherever they want, even back to themselves and then reject? Can't be that black and white surely. I feel this will definitely need the retailer to push for an investigation from Hermes, who will then need to prove delivery to the neighbour. If yours aren't playing ball then a letter before action might help. A chargeback might be worth trying as long as you make sure they understand the situation. Really its up to Yours to pursue police action as they have had is stolen, not the OP as they never aquired the item.born_again said:
Except that there is proof of delivery. (OK, not the OP address) but that does not matter on a chargeback, all they need is proof of delivery.Were_Doomed said:
I would suggest yes, although you may need to wait for 15 (?) days before it becomes officially not delivered. (I'm not sure of the exact chargeback rules).wolfbane9 said:
Thanks. What's next steps - chargeback?Were_Doomed said:Goods remain at the sender's liability until they are received by the addressee / at the address. Leaving with a neighbour - especially when expressly not agreed to - does not absolve the sender of that liability.
So retailer will simply reject on that basis.1 -
A chargeback is that black & white.wesleyad said:
But surely by that logic they can deliver to wherever they want, even back to themselves and then reject? Can't be that black and white surely. I feel this will definitely need the retailer to push for an investigation from Hermes, who will then need to prove delivery to the neighbour. If yours aren't playing ball then a letter before action might help. A chargeback might be worth trying as long as you make sure they understand the situation. Really its up to Yours to pursue police action as they have had is stolen, not the OP as they never aquired the item.born_again said:
Except that there is proof of delivery. (OK, not the OP address) but that does not matter on a chargeback, all they need is proof of delivery.Were_Doomed said:
I would suggest yes, although you may need to wait for 15 (?) days before it becomes officially not delivered. (I'm not sure of the exact chargeback rules).wolfbane9 said:
Thanks. What's next steps - chargeback?Were_Doomed said:Goods remain at the sender's liability until they are received by the addressee / at the address. Leaving with a neighbour - especially when expressly not agreed to - does not absolve the sender of that liability.
So retailer will simply reject on that basis.
On a non receipt chargeback all the retailer has to do is prove delivery. It does not matter where, just it was delivered. That is because it is card regulations and are over and above your legal rights. Card providers Visa/Mastercard set the rules.Life in the slow lane0 -
Well a bit of progress. It took me 12 messages to Yours, 1 written letter to CEO, one report to trading standards, chargeback claim and then I told them I'd contacted Joe Lycett's show - now I get a very apologetic phone call, they're sending me a denial receipt of goods form? and sending it by another courier again.0
-
It must've been the threat of Joe Lycett that did itwolfbane9 said:Well a bit of progress. It took me 12 messages to Yours, 1 written letter to CEO, one report to trading standards, chargeback claim and then I told them I'd contacted Joe Lycett's show - now I get a very apologetic phone call, they're sending me a denial receipt of goods form? and sending it by another courier again.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards