We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Buying a house on a residential mortgage for a family member to live in.

sean1990
Posts: 2 Newbie

My sister is adamant that she can purchase a house on a residential mortgage for our mum to live in, neither currently own their own property.
I have done a lot of research on the subject and everything that I have read says that if you buy a house on a residential mortgage that you must be the primary resident and if you wish to rent a house out it needs to on a buy-to-let mortgage.
I'm aware that there are some circumstances where a lender will let you rent your house out on a temporary basis as long as your initial intention was to live in the property yourself, however that doesn't apply to this situation as my sister wouldn't ever live in the house full time.
The part I think my sister has wrong is that she is under the impression that because she is planning to rent the house out to a close family member, our mum, they can get around all of the issues previously stated. But I believe she is wrong on this.
If anyone has any information on the subject that would be greatly appreciated.
I have done a lot of research on the subject and everything that I have read says that if you buy a house on a residential mortgage that you must be the primary resident and if you wish to rent a house out it needs to on a buy-to-let mortgage.
I'm aware that there are some circumstances where a lender will let you rent your house out on a temporary basis as long as your initial intention was to live in the property yourself, however that doesn't apply to this situation as my sister wouldn't ever live in the house full time.
The part I think my sister has wrong is that she is under the impression that because she is planning to rent the house out to a close family member, our mum, they can get around all of the issues previously stated. But I believe she is wrong on this.
If anyone has any information on the subject that would be greatly appreciated.
0
Comments
-
I don't think your sister can do that, the mortgage company would not want another adult living their if your sister wasn't living there
2 -
Is she going to tell the lender that her mother will be the only one living in the property?0
-
SpiderLegs said:Is she going to tell the lender that her mother will be the only one living in the property?0
-
sean1990 said:SpiderLegs said:Is she going to tell the lender that her mother will be the only one living in the property?
Might be best to advise them to speak to a broker.5 -
sean1990 said:If anyone has any information on the subject that would be greatly appreciated.You can get all the information you need by reading just about any lender's standard mortgage conditions e.g. here are the Halifax's: https://www.halifax-intermediaries.co.uk/pdf/halifax-mortgage-conditions.pdfSee page 30:"What you must do regarding your propertyYou agree to the following:• You must use your property as your only or main home. You must not let it out, unless we agree otherwise."
1 -
Is there any reason why your sister can't just buy a house and have your mother to live with her?1
-
sean1990 said:If anyone has any information on the subject that would be greatly appreciated.
she will not get a residential mortgage, she will get a Regulated Buy to Let mortgage. The latter differ from an ordinary BTL in that instead of being based on the rental income, they are based on her own income, excluding rent. So in principle they are no different to a residential mortgage in terms of how much she can borrow, but in all other respects they are NOT residential mortgages, they are BTL mortgages
There are very few lenders who offer such mortgages
here is a random google result to get you started with your own research
https://www.onlinemortgageadvisor.co.uk/buy-to-let-mortgages/regulated-buy-to-let-mortgages/
2 -
sean1990 said:SpiderLegs said:Is she going to tell the lender that her mother will be the only one living in the property?Then I see no problem. Either* the lender will say yes in which case it's fine or* the lender will say no in which case your sister will look for another option
0 -
She can do it. There are a couple of lenders who allow a residential mortgage for a property a relative will live in0
-
haras_n0sirrah said:She can do it. There are a couple of lenders who allow a residential mortgage for a property a relative will live in
If not, please point us to what you're talking about as it's news to me. Thanks.2024 wins: *must start comping again!*0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards