We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

False Positives

Options
«1

Comments

  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,966 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Concerned in what respect? No test is going to be 100% accurate. 

    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • 50Twuncle
    50Twuncle Posts: 10,763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Just realised - wrong board and am now unable to remove post !
  • Browntoa
    Browntoa Posts: 49,602 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Look on the plus side , it's false positives rather than false negatives. 
    Ex forum ambassador

    Long term forum member
  • TBH I've slowly lost respect for this government ever since the cummings affair. Their make it up as they go along approach is farcical. A relative of mine has completely been locked away in their care home since March, no contact from family at all (not allowed).

    From the rule of six to the close of pubs at 10pm. Nothing makes sense.

    They're too arrogant to listen to other scientists, they always roll out the two chuckle brothers with their flawed graph charts and scaremongering.

    I'm quite surprised people still support this government, I cannot think of one thing they've done right.

    Maybe when 4 million are out of work and the thousands of excess deaths from missed cancer appointments come to show early next year, they'll finally wake up.



  • tacpot12
    tacpot12 Posts: 9,244 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The number of false positives is tiny, especially when so many people have the virus, so I hope you are alone in being concerned. It's not a reason to be concerned. 
    The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.
  • RyanHello said:
    They're too arrogant to listen to other scientists, they always roll out the two chuckle brothers with their flawed graph charts and scaremongering.
    Which scientists do you want them to listen to?

    For reference here is the list of the ones they do listen to.

    https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage-coronavirus-covid-19-response-membership/list-of-participants-of-sage-and-related-sub-groups
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,966 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 26 September 2020 at 1:57PM
    RyanHello said:
    TBH I've slowly lost respect for this government ever since the cummings affair. Their make it up as they go along approach is farcical. A relative of mine has completely been locked away in their care home since March, no contact from family at all (not allowed).

    From the rule of six to the close of pubs at 10pm. Nothing makes sense.

    They're too arrogant to listen to other scientists, they always roll out the two chuckle brothers with their flawed graph charts and scaremongering.

    I'm quite surprised people still support this government, I cannot think of one thing they've done right.

    Maybe when 4 million are out of work and the thousands of excess deaths from missed cancer appointments come to show early next year, they'll finally wake up.



    It’s not the government telling care homes not to allow visitors as a blanket rule. 
    Each care home should be carrying out risk assessments based on their residents vulnerability and local guidance based on the spread of Covid locally, anc taking into account the impact on the person. 
    My job involves going into care homes in one area. All of them have changed their policy as the situation changes. Most have gone from total lockdown to garden and window visits, and some have them gone on to allow visitors back in by appointment.
    All are now facilitating video contact where the person is able to deal with that.
    The guidance also does not prevent care home residents from going out for a walk if they are able to socially distance. 
    Sadly as Covid in the area increases they are now having to go back into lockdown again. That is a decision for each home, not the government although there is some guidance I can post a link to if you wish.
    A care home that has allowed no contact in any form since March would be very unusual and open to challenge. 

    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • daveyjp
    daveyjp Posts: 13,527 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    50Twuncle said:
    You should be more concerned that you are linking to JHB and Talkradio.

    Some actual detail on false positives.
    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/false-positives-coronavirus_uk_5f686da4c5b6de79b677e909?f57

  • elsien said:
    RyanHello said:
    TBH I've slowly lost respect for this government ever since the cummings affair. Their make it up as they go along approach is farcical. A relative of mine has completely been locked away in their care home since March, no contact from family at all (not allowed).

    From the rule of six to the close of pubs at 10pm. Nothing makes sense.

    They're too arrogant to listen to other scientists, they always roll out the two chuckle brothers with their flawed graph charts and scaremongering.

    I'm quite surprised people still support this government, I cannot think of one thing they've done right.

    Maybe when 4 million are out of work and the thousands of excess deaths from missed cancer appointments come to show early next year, they'll finally wake up.



    It’s not the government telling care homes not to allow visitors as a blanket rule. 
    Each care home should be carrying out risk assessments based on their residents vulnerability and local guidance based on the spread of Covid locally, anc taking into account the impact on the person. 
    My job involves going into care homes in one area. All of them have changed their policy as the situation changes. Most have gone from total lockdown to garden and window visits, and some have them gone on to allow visitors back in by appointment.
    All are now facilitating video contact where the person is able to deal with that.
    The guidance also does not prevent care home residents from going out for a walk if they are able to socially distance. 
    Sadly as Covid in the area increases they are now having to go back into lockdown again. That is a decision for each home, not the government although there is some guidance I can post a link to if you wish.
    A care home that has allowed no contact in any form since March would be very unusual and open to challenge. 

    In the areas that have local lockdowns the care homes have been told not to allow visitors. 

    Not many care home residents have the capacity or the physical ability to go out for a socially distanced walk. 

    My grandmother hasn't seen her husband properly since March, just a few times through a cracked open window which he struggles to understand due to his dementia and he often wanders off.  That is no way for a 60 plus year marriage to come to an end. 
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,966 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 26 September 2020 at 3:45PM
    Which is why I said in my post according to local guidelines. Doesn’t affect my point that the government have not made a blanket decision with regards to visitors, or whether people can go out or not. 
    People who don’t have capacity or the physical ability can go out in a wheelchair unless they are being nursed in bed. There may well be staffing implications to this, but it’s not impossible where being stuck in is unduly impacting on people. 

    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.