We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Small and New landlords
Options
Comments
-
The zero equity argument only exists if the property is unsaleable for some reason. Arguably that was the case during full lockdown. That was an exceptional situation. It is not an argument that would normally apply. As I have said already there is however a 6 month disregard if the property is put on the market.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.1
-
Grumpy_chap said:Jeremy535897 said:OK, so I understand (but don't agree with) the argument that BTL property has zero equity.
As I said, that argument will not always be available (possibly where the BTL mortgage is higher than 75% would be an example).
.
Am I reading that bit back-to-front?
High mortgage means lower equity and makes the "zero equity" argument stronger?
I think if you were my Accountant I could avoid all tax and claim UC. Same for my wife. We'll be rolling in it!
"H1615 An encumbrance is secured on capital when a person is owed money and has a right
1. to the capital or
2. to stop it being sold
until the money owed is paid back. Such a debt is a legal charge or mortgage and is deducted from the value of capital. A debt which is not secured is not deducted"
In cases where the equity (valued on a traditional basis) is say only 10%, the argument that you can't evict a tenant for 6 months might persuade a DM to accept that there's enough doubt that you might see nothing at all from a sale.
UC is harder to circumvent than the Labour version of tax credits, with its high income increase disregard. In those days, you could buy a work van for say £25,000, and if the accounts results worked, the saving of tax, NIC and increase in tax credits could actually amount to £26,500. Labour never learn. Back in the seventies, people actually wanted losses from being a Name at Lloyds, because the losses could be set against income subject to tax at 98%, and the tax free repayment supplement on the tax repaid was well over 2%. O happy days...0 -
Jeremy535897 said: Yes. Remember the value of capital for UC takes debt into account,Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards