We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Do HMRC demand we rent a second home at market rate?
Options
Comments
-
Found this for what it's worth https://www.propertytribes.com/family-member-rent-free-t-127641258.html
which asks exactly the same question.
Also, if you were to trawl through this https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/property-income-manual (which I confess I haven't done) you should get chapter and verse about how rents are taxed. On a brief overview I can't see anything about taxing property income at a "deemed market rent level".
1 -
Ok wow, thanks @mrschaucer, that really is exactly the same question! I did Google it before posting here earlier today but that didn't come up / I didn't spot it. The basic gist of the Property Tribes thread is that what I've summarised above is true - there's no suggestion that HMRC will claim tax on the market rate of rent for the property - only that charging well below market rate substantially reduces the expenses we can claim against the property (so it could end up costing us money to keep the flat if e.g. the service charges and other expenses are more than the rental income we receive).
I did have a read through the HMRC manual and - like you @mrschaucer - I couldn't find anything about market rents, so I'm still a bit bemused about why @theartfullodger and this financial advisor we spoke to suggested otherwise.0 -
It seems entirely clear to me that you may charge (or not) what you like in respect of rent on your property - you will be charged to income tax as the rate appropriate to your circumstances.
The rules centre round what may be charged to expenses.5 -
xylophone said:Seems clear, and confirms what I'd always assumed.The tax is based on your income, not on what your income could be.I was offered a promotion at work once, at a higher salary, but turned it down as I didn't want the role. There was no question of HMRC taxing me on what I would have earned. They taxed me on what I actually earned.The link is about what expenses can be claimed, which is an entirely different matter.3
-
the tax implications of letting a property at below commercial market rate relates only to the restriction on the amount of any expenses that are claimed
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/property-income-manual/pim2130
there is no such thing as being taxed on a notional rent just because you let to a connected person at below market rate
bear in mind that whilst IFAs have some tax training, they are not accountants, and their knowledge is limited
0 -
They cannot tell you what to charge, they cannot tax you on income you don't receive.
What they will do is if you are only charging say 25% of the market rate they'll only let you offset 25% of the expenses, if they notice.....0 -
so if I buy flat for daughter, she pays maintenance charge and bills, I don't charge rent and don't claim any expenses against tax then we should be ticketyboo with HMRC. Thanks for the links in this thread
0 -
Mediummag said:Ok - so this is what I was saying before - HMRC won't like it if I rent at below market rate - but the only issue for us is that we won't be able to claim as much on expenses. HMRC will not insist that we pay 40% of the market rate in tax. Just that we can't deduct as much on expenses.
As I understood it, HMRC would be thinking - "Hey, this flat could generate us £800 per month in tax, but because it's only being rented out at £500 a month, we're only getting £200 a month in tax. That's annoying." But from what you've just posted above, they're not bothered about the lower tax revenue, but rather they just want to make sure that we don't get clever with our expenses that we claim. Is that right?Thats how i read it also. Plus, if they really did "force" you to charge market rate then would there not be a market rate assessment for every property?When i let my BTL house to my daughter and when she was absent for a year, a couple of friends for 6 months each, all on "mates rates" i never had any q's regarding the rate from HMRC. I was maybe charging 50% going rate.0 -
Flugelhorn said:so if I buy flat for daughter, she pays maintenance charge and bills, I don't charge rent and don't claim any expenses against tax then we should be ticketyboo with HMRC. Thanks for the links in this thread
0 -
greatcrested said:Flugelhorn said:so if I buy flat for daughter, she pays maintenance charge and bills, I don't charge rent and don't claim any expenses against tax then we should be ticketyboo with HMRC. Thanks for the links in this thread0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards