We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Protecting my home from creditors

Options
Is there a watertight legal way to protect the house I live in from creditors in the event of my property rental business failing due to Coronovirus & its impact on my tenants (students at university & wage earners)I have mortgages,though not on my home,but my income will crash in a worst-case-scenario situation(universities closing,unemployment soaring/tenants without income.I am over 70 & don't want my home to be repossessed in the event of falling behind with mortgage payments
«1

Comments

  • Other than not owning it, no.
  • Home protection trusts?
  • How does the OP propose to pay back his creditors in the worst case scenario then?
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 18,230 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why not sell the rental properties to release sufficient capital to pay off whatever mortgages are remaining?  The other properties (including your home) will remain mortgage free and therefore protected from repossession (as there are no longer any creditors).  I assume at least some of the student properties became vacant over the summer so would be available to sell.
  • Home protection trusts - whatever they are? -- Far too late now the borrowing is done, the only 100% way to keep you r home is to pay for it. Is it security for any business guarantee?
  • Jeremy535897
    Jeremy535897 Posts: 10,732 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    My understanding is that OP owns his own home outright, and other rental properties subject to mortgages. That would mean that the first resort of the mortgage lenders would be the homes on which the mortgages are secured. There would only be a risk to OP's home if there was insufficient equity in a property or properties subject to the mortgage(s). Mortgagors can seek payment of outstanding capital and interest within time limits (12 years and 6 years respectively in England).

    Asset protection trusts have come in for some bad press, as their purpose is normally to avoid liability for future care home fees. Local authorities have been successful in arguing that this is a deprivation of assets and therefore is ineffective to reduce capital. More to the point here, asset protection trusts can be set aside if the intention is to avoid paying creditors, but it would be hard for creditors to do that if, at the time the asset protection trust was made, there was sufficient equity in the mortgaged properties to meet all outstanding balances.

    I would strongly recommend that OP seeks legal advice as soon as possible. In the meantime, the following page gives more information regarding the pursuit of mortgage debts:
    https://www.nationaldebtline.org/EW/factsheets/Pages/mortgage-shortfalls/mortgage-debt.aspx
  • davelewis
    davelewis Posts: 472 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    edited 20 September 2020 at 3:50PM
    Would it also depend if the OP owns the investment properties as a 'Limited Company?'
    If he owns the investment properties as a private individual, unfortunately the creditors can indeed pursue his own home for the shortfall should the investment properties fail to satisfy the mortgages.

    Another thought is that the mortgage companies for the investment properties may look favourably on accepting tenants that are on 'Universal Credit' should unemployment peak. They won't want to repossess unless they absolutely have to, although BTL mortgages are seen as 'business loans' not attracting the same protection as residential mortgages.
  • Seem your iPhone and cancel Netflix, that's the usual advice given to people trying to raise money to buy a house.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As you are over 70. Is there still a need to take excessive risk. Start to liquidate the portfolio, derisk and live off the capital. 
  • Worst case scenario I was imagining was a property price crash & ending up in negative equity,or a moribund property market & too much supply,little demand due to economic situation in UK-mass unemployment etc.I have a mortgage-free property I can sell now which would help.If it was in the SE-problem diminshed.But its in the NW & despite being on the market for months,only 2 viewings,no offers.Brexit & pandemic making an already  difficult market worse in the NW.
    If I release equity from my home,I get a lump sum & the property would be secure until my death.I'll go for that.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.