PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Subsidence issue

Options
Hi,
We're currently in the process of buying a house but have come up against a hurdle and could really do with some opinions. I've already read a lot on the subject so ideally I'm keen for opinions of what you would do and similar experiences you may have had.
Will try and keep things concise
- We currently are renting a property which we had been offered to purchase which we took. We love the house, perfect size and just in the right location. We are also cash buyers (more on this later).
- The property was built around the 1900s from stone.
- There has always been some external cracking to one of the walls which had new mortar at some point. This had opened up further after the new mortar albeit we arnt aware when. All before our time here. It doesn't appear to have gotten worse since we have been there.
- the survey report identified additional cracking (and we found some more subsequently) all at one end and thinks the likely reason is down to localised subsidence. There are a few very clear bad practices (downpipes emptying straight onto soil bed at base of property), ceddar tree (albeit small) growing against the house. 
- there are very few signs internally of cracking (just a bit on the cornice and ruffled wallpaper). 

So onto some questions 
- for the purposes of insurance, future sale, do we now have subsidence we have to notify? The surveyors report wasn't absolute (there is also a slightly bowing roof not helping matters)
- how difficult is it really to sell a property with this label (assuming it doesn't get worse) at a close to market price? We are likely moving on in 4-6 years, this isn't the "forever house". 
- same again, but for purchasers acquiring a mortgage in future. The mortgage question has come up quite late in the day as we're cash buyers so obviously no mortgage company to raise the red flag. I'm concerned noone has "rectified" the issue so how would a future buyer ever be able to convince a mortgage company it is ok / not getting worse? We could obviously start measuring from possession for several years with a surveyor / SE, is this the only way..? 
- There is no history of subsidence in the area and the ground is known for being good, so we feel the risk of things getting worse is low provided we do the measures above, but we're concerned about an onward sale. 
Thoughts are welcome, if you've been in a similar situation even better!
Many thanks
T
«1

Comments

  • I have just sold a house with subsidence. Bought it 13 years ago. There was evidence of ‘long-standing and non-progressive movement’- I later found out due to the land the house was built on. It was a Victorian terrace and the whole row were effected by the issue. Over a period of about 5 years cracks gradually started to appear in the cornice and an interior wall. I made an insurance claim. They did investigations to rule out problems with tree roots or the drains and basically tarted it up. The same cracks came back after another 5ish years. I just sold for about 15% below market value and slightly less than I paid for it. To be honest I thought I would struggle to sell it at all. My buildings/contents insurance was £65 a month when I left.
    The whole subsidence issue was stressful and had I realised the implications, I wouldn’t have bought the house in the first place. Or certainly paid less to reflect the issues. 
  • Thanks for your response steadfast. I'm increasingly getting the feeling that progressing this would be a case of heart before head ... 
  • SMR710
    SMR710 Posts: 161 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Walk away!! 
  • Semple
    Semple Posts: 392 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I always get the impression that subsidence (even when rectified) always carries a big red flag. Even if it was sorted, there's always that question as to whether it would happen again. 

    Considering the increased insurance costs, and potential loss in value of the property for future resale, it's not something I'd even consider. 
  • Check the cause of the subsidence. Might be due to broken drainage?
  • Check the cause of the subsidence. Might be due to broken drainage?
    Thanks for the response
    There isn't any drainage at that end of the property, all our drainage runs along the back. The downpipes in this area just pumps water out onto the flower bed that runs along the edge of the house.

    I potential and probably exasperating cause but as I've read, you never know the true cause and solution until you've got maybe 20 years of no movement recorded.
  • I'm buying a property on an area with subsidence. Mortgage provider seems to not be fussed. There is no cracking the the building and to my awareness no historical problems with subsidence.
  • Hannimal said:
    I'm buying a property on an area with subsidence. Mortgage provider seems to not be fussed. There is no cracking the the building and to my awareness no historical problems with subsidence.
    From what i can gather areas of subsidence have slightly increased building insurance premiums but not much other negative effect. From reading elsehwere - most banks are happy to provide you a mortgage provided you can get insurance with a mainstream insurer. Having researched it doesn't look like we can. 
  • blue_max_3
    blue_max_3 Posts: 1,194 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You could allow a sum to make repairs/underpin and knock that off the purchase price. I'm sure once fixed, you would have more luck with the insurers.
  • You could allow a sum to make repairs/underpin and knock that off the purchase price. I'm sure once fixed, you would have more luck with the insurers.
    Yeah we were thinking about that, but as others have said, once your property is flagged as subsidence it will always be. Suppose we could ask cost of repairs and overall deduction... Stil not sure the stress of selling is worth it as per first response. Argh!
    Thanks 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.