We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
I am Buying a house, then renting it back to the seller

terrymoneysavingexpert
Posts: 15 Forumite

Hi
I am thinking of buying a house, then renting it back to the seller.
We will be doing a new contract for the new rental and the seller is on benefits and claiming universal credit including rent allowance.
Are there any pitfalls I should look out for or does anyone have any experience of something similar.
Thanks Terry
I am thinking of buying a house, then renting it back to the seller.
We will be doing a new contract for the new rental and the seller is on benefits and claiming universal credit including rent allowance.
Are there any pitfalls I should look out for or does anyone have any experience of something similar.
Thanks Terry
0
Comments
-
Af the seller is a family member they probably won't be able to claim benefits0
-
You are registered under the financial services legislation for doing a "sale and rent back"? See 14.5 of this https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PERG/1/?view=chapter2
-
Are you buying as an investment. I would do the usual checks to the tenants that I would for anyone else (credit, affordability etc).
I have to be honest though, I would question why they are selling it, no one sells their house to then rent unless they have too, sometimes its legitimate (moving away from area for job, living in a studio and need a bigger house for increasing family) sometimes its to pay off large amounts of debt.
If the vendor wants to stay in the house, then it sounds like it could be due to money worries and I would be very wary of this, if they are not able to budget correctly to keep a mortgage then its going to be worse to keep to a budget for rent, this could leave you in a difficult situation.
If you are happy that they can afford the rent, then I would rely on your solicitor here and get the proper contracts drawn up. Other than that, as long as you are getting a buy to let mortgage, then there is nothing wrong with buying a property with a tenant in situ, I guess this would be a similar situation.
The other question would be the sale money, if they have a large equity in the property then the seller might be going over the saving allowance for benefits and will be unable to claim any more until they are under the allowance.0 -
Hi
Thanks for your advice.
It is an old and dear friend who is in trouble, not related. I am not doing it for financial gain, but I don't want to lose any money.
I was hoping that I could buy the house then rent it back on a normal tenancy, but she would need to claim her rent back as on benefits.
I have read that you are not allowed to claim benefits for rent on a house you have previously owned, but then I have also read that you might be allowed if it is the only way to stay in their home.
I am looking for some comments from anyone who has tried it please.
Thanks Terry0 -
Terrible idea - don’t do it.Better off just giving her some cash as a loan; exactly the same likelihood of getting it back with less tax to worry about3
-
SDLT_Geek said:You are registered under the financial services legislation for doing a "sale and rent back"? See 14.5 of this https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PERG/1/?view=chapter
Just to emphasise SDLT_Geek's comment - you have to be regulated and monitored by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in order to do Sale and Rent Back (even as a sole trader).
If you do this and you're not registered with the FCA, you're breaking the law.
And even if you are regulated by the FCA, here's a news story about a 'Sale and Rent Bank' sole trader who was fined £945k by the FCA for misleading clients about the value of their homes etc. So be careful! https://www.ft.com/content/96a67f90-d8d2-11e2-84fa-00144feab7de
Having said that, in 2012, the FCA closed down every 'sale and rent back' firm that existed - presumably because they were all unfit.
This website suggests that by 2019, still no regulated businesses existed - so unless you got regulated in the last few months, I'm guessing you're not actually regulated. https://www.theadvisory.co.uk/sell-house-fast/sale-and-rent-back-schemes/2 -
terrymoneysavingexpert said:I have read that you are not allowed to claim benefits for rent on a house you have previously owned, but then I have also read that you might be allowed if it is the only way to stay in their home.1
-
terrymoneysavingexpert said:Hi
I am thinking of buying a house, then renting it back to the seller.
We will be doing a new contract for the new rental and the seller is on benefits and claiming universal credit including rent allowance.
Are there any pitfalls I should look out for or does anyone have any experience of something similar.
Thanks Terry0 -
Hi all
thanks it looks like a minefield.
If I pay her monthly mortgage can I take a charge on her house so that the amount is repaid to me when she sells the house.
I could just add 2% interest to cover my costs.
Thanks Terry
0 -
The friend has a mortgage and the mortgagee has a first charge on the property.
In theory, you could make the friend a loan and (if the mortgagee agreed), take a second charge on the property.
Presumably your legal agreement with the friend would be that the interest rate would "roll up" to be paid with the capital on sale of the property.
This would have tax implications for you in the year of receipt.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards